Greenspan favors CASH bailout of mortgages - cost hundreds of billions

Discussion in 'Economics' started by Trader KGB, Dec 16, 2007.

  1. What a lunatic this guy is.. First in that WSJ editorial where he tried to indemnify himself from any responsibility for the housing bubble (as if 1% rates had nothing to do with it). And now he's out spewing this nonsense. Unbelievable...

    edit - Bloomberg keeps pulling the story down and then it reappears. If the link doesn't work, just try again in a couple minutes.

    Full text:

    Greenspan Favors Government Bailout for Homeowners (Update2)

    By Steve Matthews

    Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) -- Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said he favors spending U.S. government money to bail out mortgage borrowers who risk losing their homes because they can't make payments.

    Greenspan, speaking on ABC's ``This Week'' program aired today, said cash bailouts, while creating a larger budget deficit, have the advantage of helping homeowners without distorting property prices or interest rates on mortgages.

    ``Cash is available and we should use that in larger amounts, as is necessary, to solve the problems of the stress of this,'' Greenspan said. ``It's far less damaging to the economy to create a short-term fiscal problem, which we would, than to try to fix the prices of homes or interest rates. If you do that, it'll drag this process out indefinitely.''

    Greenspan's suggested approach differs from that of Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who negotiated a freeze on the interest rates of some subprime mortgages without pledging any government money to help homeowners or banks.

    Allan Meltzer, professor of political economy at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, said Greenspan's proposal for a cash bailout might cost ``hundreds of billions'' of dollars and would be counterproductive.

    ``It is not a good idea for the government to bail out people who make mistakes,'' said Meltzer, the author of a 2002 book on the early history of the Fed. ``The markets are beginning to come to grips with this and bailing them out is a mistake, not a small one but a big one.''

    Odds of Recession

    Greenspan, who was Fed chairman for almost two decades until Ben S. Bernanke took over early last year, repeated that recession risks are rising.

    ``The probabilities of a recession have moved up to close to 50 percent -- whether it's above or below is really extraordinarily difficult to tell,'' Greenspan said.

    In a Dec. 13 interview with National Public Radio, he said the economy is ``getting close to stall speed.'' On Nov. 7, he told a conference in Sao Paolo that the chances of a recession were ``less than 50-50.''

    U.S. economic growth will slow to 1 percent in the fourth quarter as consumer spending cools and the housing slump enters its third year, according to a survey of 63 economists by Bloomberg News taken Dec. 3 to Dec. 10. The world's largest economy grew at a 4.9 percent pace from July through September.

    Consumer Spending

    Spending, which accounts for more than two-thirds of the economy, will grow in 2008 at the slowest pace in 17 years as higher fuel costs and falling home values limit consumers' buying power, economists predict.

    President George W. Bush announced this month that Paulson and other members of his administration had reached an agreement with the mortgage industry to help as many as 1.2 million homeowners avoid foreclosure when their adjustable-rate mortgages jump to higher rates.

    Working with Paulson and the government's housing regulators, lenders and the companies who manage home loans agreed to freeze some adjustable mortgages at current rates for five years. Others will be given help refinancing or qualifying for loans backed by the Federal Housing Authority.

    The Paulson plan would be less ``intrusive'' than Greenspan's cash approach, Meltzer said.

    ``This seems to me to be destroying an effective financial market,'' he said. ``When financial-market participants take great risks and they gain, they win. If they lose, the government picks up the losses. It is not a sensible system and not one that can survive.''
  2. mokwit


    He should just shut his stupid senile face and start preparing his legal defence.
  3. ""It is not a sensible system and not one that can survive.''"

    Nor will our currency or our economy.
  4. [​IMG]

    Any similarity to any persons, living or dead is accidental and purely coincidental...
  5. I think Big Al needs to move to assisted living and be watched 24/7
  6. LOL....I heard an interview with Marc Faber (Singapore), where they mentioned that both Al and Marc worked together in their first jobs on Wall Street. Faber was quick to point out that Greenspan was fired from the "Chief Economist" position.

  7. Ayn Rand is rolling over in her grave.