Give your command over the scientific process, I won't too much faith in your reading abilities. Take a look at the youtube video of the interview I posted instead
you are are troll.... i did your work and posted the papers you were pretending supported your position. so tell us... which paper says man made co2 causes warming. you won't because there is no science there saying man made co2 causes warming. citing to youtube is not peer reviewed science... your arguments are a joke.
you sent us to faq page and youtube to explain the arguments you should have been supporting with facts and links. I saw that the peer review journal you were citing too... was a paid for fraud. I saw the papers you cited to had nothing to do with co2. So its time for you to admit you got nothing,you lied and your are a moron troll.
Oh, he's definitely a troll. He's essentially admitted to coming here for no other purpose than to engage into flame wars.
More right wing honesty on display, this is the guy who asked me for a wager and then backed out citing bullshit reasons.
The FAQ page mentions an entire section on peer review, the youtube video mentions how he went on about the study. Secondly, the guy was funded by Kochs, how is he a fraud. Thirdly, he mentions greenhouse gases, that's the CO2 part So it's time to admit you have no expertise on this subject and go back to ranting about skewed polls
I'm up for the wager if we can put some safeguard in place that prevents you from finding my personal identity, like an agreed escrow person who acts as a middle man. Otherwise, I could never trust you with my identity - you'd no doubt do something to fuck with me on a professional level. There's simply no way I'd want to risk that. The fact that you are now sharing private IM info just reinforces that concern.
look you lying ass troll exgoper... you have produced no peer reviewed science showing man made co2 causes warming. you telling us to go read things on a FAQ resulted in my finding out the "papers" had nothing to do with man made co2 and warming... your telling us to go read the wiki resulted us finding out the "peer reviewed" was a paid for fraudulent journal. And even the FAQ page makes a nonsensical argument. They could just provide a link on their page... they did not have to pay a fraudulent journal to make the paper available to the public.
Just because you suck at finding scientific papers or even comprehending them, doesn't make anyone a troll This is from the guy who says the science is indisputable - there is no science that is indisputable. That's not how even science works for crying out loud