Grains Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Buy1Sell2, Feb 7, 2006.

  1. Thanks!

     
    #231     Jan 12, 2007
  2. b1s2, could you tell us if you can, given yesterday's price movements, are you still short planning on adding to your july wheat position, or have you bailed out at this time.
     
    #232     Jan 13, 2007
  3. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    Yes, I am building a short July Wheat position here and will add on the next short signal. Wheat is the weak sister of the grains in my view.
     
    #233     Jan 15, 2007
  4. Do you still think thats wise considering how desperate those corn bids were on Friday? (68000) Why couldn't wheat go to 5.10-5.50 on merely sympathy buying alone?
     
    #234     Jan 15, 2007
  5. very fascinating activity on corn.

    volume only hit 18k tonight on globex zc and we came slightly off limit up, but the bid was almost 70k contracts on friday. possible that ecbot dumped a bunch of buy orders?

    Any ideas here? or fundamental news I'm missing?

    or are shorts merely too lazy to attempt closing their positions on MLK day?


    these ags are tough.
     
    #235     Jan 15, 2007
  6. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    I think the fact that Wheat could not maintain limit up Friday is indicative of it's overall bearish nature. I would love to be able to sell more in the 5.50 range. I am bearish July Wheat.
     
    #236     Jan 16, 2007
  7. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    I really don't know.
     
    #237     Jan 16, 2007
  8. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    A break of 4.82 basis July 07 Wheat would most likely constitute the Larry Williams "oops" pattern where longs would get surprised. We'll see. I remain bearish July 07 Wheat and have added today at 4.84 1/2:)
     
    #238     Jan 16, 2007
  9. Buy1Sell2

    Buy1Sell2

    There's the break of 4.82. Let's see if we can close below it.
     
    #239     Jan 16, 2007
  10. The oops story was first puplished by Robert Evans of the Wyckoff Institute in 1955, long before Larry Williams could say uncle.

    In this version it is the shorts not the longs getting surprised.

    The shorts need to cover because of the sudden up move, they are forced to liquidate, thereby removing potential buying power. This is also the terminology for short covering. The result is negative.

    I am not sure though if the action in the grains can be called an oops, because prices (as per definition) would need to fade immediately.
     
    #240     Jan 17, 2007