It's a waste of this (me) kook's time. He asks questions like a budget is two line items and only two line items. It's ignorant of the process.
Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down?
That was actually what I wanted, an immediate relief to payroll withholding. Emps would have gone out with their bigger checks and bought stuff. But no, the black tie and ballgown set can't have that, the money has to funnel through their shareholdings first. And you're right about government, but there are also a couple of wars going on. Disagree about job creation through tax relief. Would have made no difference to me, there were simply not sales enough to justify hiring (or even retention, unfortunately).
First I caught you posing as a trader: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2788731&highlight=Ricter#post2788731 And now you're posing as an intellectual who's too busy to answer valid questions? Get a life Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down.
Sigh. Ceteris paribus thinking? New entitlements will not necessarily raise healthcare costs. If you can't see why "not necessarily" is true you could not be trusted to balance so much as a checkbook, much less do budgeting.
More word vomit....... Not necessarily raise healthcare costs was not the question, I will post it again. Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down?
And your plan to become a billionaire by winning the lottery every single week will "not necessarily" fail either. Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down. Your stupidity is priceless