GOP Leaders Remind Voters the Economy Does Better Under Democrats

Discussion in 'Politics' started by hermit, Jul 21, 2010.

  1. Ricter

    Ricter

    The thing about including the cost of our wars is that
    the benefit of cheap inputs to our industry would
    also have to be factored in. And those are not
    precisely known quantities, though I think the wealth
    and power of the United States is pretty much proof that
    those wars do pay off, thus making new wars a
    pretty good bet.
     
    #21     Jul 22, 2010
  2. Yet another red herring from the libtard liar :p

    Those numbers are FROM OBAMA'S BUDGET. Ask Obama why they're there.
    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2900278#post2900278

    Every time you lie about this you prove how desperate and pathetic you are.
     
    #22     Jul 22, 2010
  3. Keep digging idiot.

    This is from Bush's budget of 09, I am sure your neocon site didnt project this too. .:p

    http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=216

    The cumulative deficit from 2010 to 2019 under the President’s proposals would total $9.3 trillion, compared with a cumulative deficit of $4.4 trillion projected under the current-law assumptions embodied in CBO’s baseline. Debt held by the public would rise, from 41 percent of GDP in 2008 to 57 percent in 2009 and then to 82 percent of GDP by 2019 (compared with 56 percent of GDP in that year under baseline assumptions)
     
    #23     Jul 22, 2010
  4. $9.3 trillion by 2019 is chump change compared to the projections from Obama's budget. Now who's the idiot?

    [​IMG]

    <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2900281>
     
    #24     Jul 22, 2010
  5. Notice to everyone - Obama is going to do bailouts and stimulus every year, even if there is no need for it, Why? Because the neocon site say so and the resident neocon believes it.
     
    #25     Jul 22, 2010
  6. #26     Jul 22, 2010
  7. There fixed that for you.
     
    #27     Jul 22, 2010