GOOG @$38 fat fingers or manipulation

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by howardy2k, Jul 20, 2006.

  1. shocking, is the no justice.

    for some this was the only good trade they have made in 5 years.

    and to be taken away like this makes you want to [​IMG]
     
    #31     Jul 20, 2006
  2. bouncy

    bouncy

    how did they determine the cut off point of 353.07? what formula/rule do they apply?
     
    #32     Jul 20, 2006
  3. that's one fat finger indeed...according to the afterhours quotes on the Nasdaq website about 40K went off @ 38. Hope no one cleared their position.
     
    #33     Jul 20, 2006
  4. Can some one please briefly explain how something like this could happen? Did some put in an order to sell at 38? Also, it looks like it hit 38 more than once, and 37.99. Was it the same order? Thanks for your help
     
    #34     Jul 20, 2006
  5. Edit...the break price is 352.07...not 353.07.

    Not sure why they randomly chose that price. They should have made it the previous AH low (somewhere around 365).
     
    #35     Jul 20, 2006
  6. 40k x $40= only 1.6 mil

    congrat to those lucky sob who bought at 352
     
    #36     Jul 20, 2006
  7. You've come to the right place, as ET is known as the source of just this kind of wisdom. DO NOT attempt to ask these questions on RB or Yahoo boards, you will be injured.

    What happened is this. Someone went to sell some large 380 GOOG on isld. They forgot the extra zero , and swept the book down to the 38 level.

    Simple as that.
     
    #37     Jul 20, 2006
  8. More than likely someone wanted to sell @ 380 and forgot a zero.

    I'm guessing that they chose 352 b/c it's roughly 10% away from where it was trading. Trading @ 392....352+39 = 391.
     
    #38     Jul 20, 2006
  9. Is only 100 shares.
     
    #39     Jul 20, 2006
  10. Man the great quality posts we have in the last few hours....we get a "ok" post in one thread and one here that makes no sense whatsoever. Go team!
     
    #40     Jul 20, 2006