Good Bye Kramer!

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by Maverick74, Nov 20, 2006.

  1. 1. klannish
    2 thumbs up


    1. of pertaining to or characteristic of a clan of right wing regressive Republicans.
    2. inclined to associate exclusively with the members of one's own group; cliquish: the clannish behavior of the original members of the country club, as currently exemplified by right wing regressive Republicans.
    3. imbued with or influenced by the sentiments, prejudices, or the like, of a clan of right wing regressive Republicans.

    The Rush Limbaugh dittoheads are klannish.
    tags repugnican repugican republitard dittohead republicanazi
    by Samuel L. Charles Berkeley, California Aug 24, 2006 email it


    and

    1. republiklan
    19 up, 9 down


    A person who supports United State policies, at the same time getting upset when another country used the same policy towards them. They are convinced that the media is run by liberals and communists; because we all know Karl Marx loved moneyline.

    Ann Coulter is a Republiklan.
    by Drake Dracoli Jun 8, 2003 email it


    From: http://www.urbandictionary.com/

    note: Kramer is a character, and Michael Richards is an actor, and the "script" he was working from on that night was not a episode of a "black" comedy...


     
    #101     Nov 27, 2006
  2. stereo70

    stereo70

    You know what's funny: Michael Richards attended Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington which is the most hardcore PC-liberal school I've ever seen.
     
    #102     Nov 27, 2006
  3. pattersb

    pattersb Guest


    I can make up words also!



    1. klannish
    2 thumbs up


    1. of pertaining to or characteristic of a clan of left-wing progressive Democrats.

    2. inclined to associate exclusively with the members of one's own group; cliquish: the clannish behavior of the original members of the politically-correct, as currently exemplified by left wing progressive Democrats.

    3. imbued with or influenced by the sentiments, prejudices, or the like, of a clan of left wing progressive Democrats..

    The Michael Moore, Al Frankens, 9-11 conspirators are klannish. The people that immediately prejudged a white-guy, through their "white-guys are inherently evil and racist glasses" and threw him under a bus, for what could easily have been a poor joke gone horribly wrong, exposing themselves as foolish-hypocrits.

    A person who doesn't support United State policies, at the same time support other country's that use the same policy towards them. They are convinced that the media is run by conservatives and facists; because we all know The NYTimes, Dan Rather, Bill Moyers, Katie Kurac loved Ronald Reagan.


    Now I just need to come up with a name: How About Democraps!
     
    #103     Nov 28, 2006
  4. I don't have to explain anything.

    The "mess we are in" should be self evident.

    All you have to do is OPEN YOUR EYES.

    We send soldiers to the Mid East because we want to stop "terrorist" yet we can't seal our own borders.

    WAKE UP AMERICA AND SMELL THE HYPOCRISY!
     
    #104     Dec 1, 2006
  5. Arnie

    Arnie

    #105     Dec 5, 2006
  6. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest

    #106     Dec 5, 2006

  7. ludicrous that ANYONE could think there's ANY EXCUSE for this behavior. i don't care what the hecklers said or did. kramer's behavior is a reflection on kramer. ridiculous to make excuses otherwise....

    the utter gall of someone to suggest that someone OTHER THAN kramer was responsible for kramer's behavior. where's all your PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY now?
     
    #107     Dec 5, 2006
  8. You are right. Just like someone OTHER THAN Jackson, Sharpton, Farrakhan, Cedric, Bernie, Chapelle, Kanye, Dusty, Artest can't be responsible for their behaviour. The difference is our double standards and society being too PC to call out the real racists.
    Gotta go... Seinfelds on.
     
    #108     Dec 5, 2006
  9. lol, look in the mirror. Amazing how all the knee jerks fail to even consider what PROVOKED the guy.

    Focusing solely on the response simply because it was EXTREME is a typical reaction of the simpleminded.

    Oh, except when the offender is a drug addict or such, then the 'crime' gets ignored altogether, and victimhood is bestowed.


    Yes!!!!!!!!! I agree
    [​IMG]
     
    #109     Dec 6, 2006
  10. neophyte321

    neophyte321 Guest


    Given the power, what punishment would you level upon him for this behavior?


    .... I see the future, more and more women in power legislating the behavior of men. Farting has now been outlawed and all language that can in any way be deemed offensive by a protected class, (ie; women and minorities), is punishable by loss of job, reputation, half his possessions, and fore-ever be considered a mean jerk.... (On second thought, I think I'm seeing the present.)


    it was in NY comedy club tutz, not on the steps of some Alabama school house, no excuse needed.
     
    #110     Dec 6, 2006