This is actually a wrong example. The chick is rich on her own. "Her family owns Melville Castle outside Edinburgh" I mean she used to spend her weekends in a castle, just how poor can she be? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Linton
How about this one https://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/entertainment-articles/7-famous-gold-diggers/
Since the beginning of time...it's been like this; Men look for good looks/genes in women for reproduction values, and Women look for men who are successful/able/rich enough to properly take care of their offspring. (and themselves) It really boils down to Basic nature and survival necessities. Good bone structure is desirable in men, and good hips/hourglass figure is desirable in women. It's not necessarily automatically 'shallow' or bad or evil, I say. Anybody who tells you different is full of stuff, or delusional of the inner workings of reality/society. Make Trading Great Again 2018, ET extraterrestrials...High-Five`, Xela and d08 and Johnny Rock Mazal tov, Morse and Jacob Sweet and Sour Bobby...where ya at... still eating that TastyTrade Karen for lunch
“If the law is on your side, argue the law. If the facts are on your side, argue the facts. If neither the law nor the facts are on your side, attack the character of the witness.” you are clueless to what constitutes well written prose. the OP's writing is actually quite good. because you don't agree with his post and don't know how to counter his points, you sink to using the slimy tactic of denigrating his command of english.
His first sentence and first paragraph don't even have a subject. That's enough for me to conclude that his grasp of the English language is quite poor. As for your assumptions of my reasoning for commenting on his language skills, it could just be that I generally found his English skills or lack thereof to be less than impressive. I didn't comment on his points because I felt that they were mostly either trivial or off-base.