Global warming

Discussion in 'Politics' started by indahook, Feb 2, 2007.

  1. BVM88

    BVM88

    #51     Feb 6, 2007
  2. Very true.

    The evidence is out there. Atmospheric content can be traced thousands & thousands of years back. They were doing this long before Al Gore made his movie.

    At some point it's just common sense. But that's not a common trait anymore.

    And whoever said Nuclear fission is green & clean, wow, how clueless are you?.
     
    #52     Feb 6, 2007
  3. man

    man

    the issue in my eyes is very much connected to the
    code of conduct within the US conservatives. they
    are willing to sacrifice any thing to get and stay in
    power. it is very necessary that the US people realise
    that. there is something fundamentally wrong with the
    right fundamentalists.
     
    #53     Feb 6, 2007
  4. man

    man

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgXCE-CtUSY&mode=related&search=

    what i find so puzzeling is that these people can say
    two things at the same time: we do not know at all
    what is going on, because it is so complex, but we know
    for sure it is not CO2 that is a concern. what a coincidence
    that this is in line with the economic interest of the
    "big" ones ...
     
    #54     Feb 6, 2007
  5. man

    man

    do you guys know a place where one can follow the
    debate between the opponents more "live"? a climate
    forum or something of that kind?
     
    #55     Feb 6, 2007
  6. man

    man

  7. Are you one of the "tree-huggers?"

    http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-12/p34.html
    "MIT Study Sees Nuclear Power as Green Weapon Against Global Warming"
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/14/AR2006041401209_pf.html
    "In the early 1970s when I helped found Greenpeace, I believed that nuclear energy was synonymous with nuclear holocaust, as did most of my compatriots. That's the conviction that inspired Greenpeace's first voyage up the spectacular rocky northwest coast to protest the testing of U.S. hydrogen bombs in Alaska's Aleutian Islands. Thirty years on, my views have changed, and the rest of the environmental movement needs to update its views, too, because nuclear energy may just be the energy source that can save our planet from another possible disaster: catastrophic climate change."
     
    #57     Feb 6, 2007
  8. Im about as worried now as I was when Y2k came....BILLIONS spent to do what exactly??????
     
    #58     Feb 6, 2007
  9. Good analogy. People always second guess preventive measures. They should instead be thankful that the disaster didn't happen, probably thanks to the measures taken.
     
    #59     Feb 6, 2007
  10. #60     Feb 6, 2007