Global Warming-Why Does NASA Hate Science?

No, the irony is that both of you are drunk on your religion. Of course, irony often escapes you.

 

You step in shit and try to deny it, and then tell me about irony? Seems to me you're a cautionary tale for Southern style home schooling.

 

And I think you are a zealot. This conversation is fun.

 

Lol

 

Only because you like getting dizzy going in circles.

 

I call what I see. Sorry man.

 

Yes, you are.

 

so is this no longer true because you have a problem with the scientists views on intelligent design?

Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models.
"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans."
In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted.

 

Your so called "debunking" is from 2008. The study was just completed and includes an analysis of NASA satellite date through 2011.

 

your threads are from 2008 and apparently not even published on the net anymore. at least not at those links.

next... how can they be a line by line refutation...
first we would need a line.

next... how can they be about the recent up to 2011 data?

I am not saying you could not present a cogent refutation of spencers work... what I would really like to see is the data and an explantion.