Would you like to rephrase that? OK. For the low comprehension readers out there.......................... The sun is not responsible for the current warming trend. IOW, solar output has not gone up. In fact it has gone down even as temps continue to rise.
Actually as of 2003 solar was trending up. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/0313irradiance.html "Historical records of solar activity indicate that solar radiation has been increasing since the late 19th century. If a trend, comparable to the one found in this study, persisted throughout the 20th century, it would have provided a significant component of the global warming the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports to have occurred over the past 100 years," he said. --- I am sure you will till us lately there has been no solar output increase. In return... we will show you there has been no warming for 17.5 years. You will say but the oceans. I will tell you that you have no concept that co2 warms the oceans. That the sun and volanoes warm the oceans and that change in ocean temps leads change in temps over land. The difference between my argument and yours... is that I have already linked to science proving my argument.... you just spout bullshit without any science.
Jerm, it's not the sun. There are people who have this all figured out. They are called climatologists. And 97% know that man has caused most of the warming. And you figured out that CO2 does not warm the oceans? Good for you! Keep it up. Someday you will figure out what a greenhouse gas is.
Peer reviewed paper show its really .03%. 41 out of over 11,000 papers support the consensus. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-013-9647-9 However, inspection of a claim by Cook et al. (Environ Res Lett 8:024024, 2013) of 97.1 % consensus, heavily relied upon by Bedford and Cook, shows just 0.3 % endorsement of the standard definition of consensus: that most warming since 1950 is anthropogenic.
When results go bad http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/when-results-go-bad/ From the article You can see that, as Professor Karlen said, this does not show what the âNorthern Europeâ part of the IPCC graph shows. It is exactly as Professor Karlen stated, in the NORDKLIM data it rises until 1930, there is a drop from 1930 to 1970, followed by an increase after the 1970s to a temperature slightly lower than the 1930s. (In fact, the rise from 1880 until 1930 dwarfs the recent rise since the 1970â²s). Here, for comparison, is a blowup of the âNorthern Europeâ graph from Fig. 9.12 above:
It shows nothing of the kind. Jerm, you're just not right. LOL Read this.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
It's nothing of the kind. Absurd. So far off that you obviously have no shame to lie about such a thing. Read this and then tell me it's only 0.3%. You're totally fucked in the head. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change