Thats a good thought. I suggest you build a model showing Co2 causes warming in the oceans. (don't forget that as oceans warm they release co2, so you causation issue will require pretty tricky speculation) When you release your study you should try and brand yourself. I think the Ricter Clinton Gore warming model would work wonders. Then get funding from the democrats Then you can have GS and some other companies set up the carbon exchange. Then have them put your name on their carbon warming contract. Then you can get a tiny royalty for every contract traded. All because of your speculation.
So I need to show that heat can be transferred from a gas to a liquid, or show that a dark surface absorbs more solar energy than a light surface?
futurecurrents suffers from a disease common to most liberals. That all information disseminated from life-wing media propagandist is the whole truth and nothing but the truth and under no circumstances is to be questioned, while any and all information disseminated from right-wing propagandist is a pack of lies from liars who's only motive is to propagate their conspiracy of evil capitalism. One can't really blame them, questioning everything and trying to sort through all the crap requires deliberation and effort.
With monocle and lab coat in-dress, I present the ultimate correlation concerning climate change: Conclusion: I hereby propose that all welfare spending be cut, in addition to most of the military/DoD/DHS/[insert all other 3-letter agencies here]. Problem solved, but not to either political faction's liking...so you know it's got to be good.
top notch research by agw standards. to stop global warming... we must cut the govt spending immediately and cut taxes to the wages earners to stimulate the economy and grow tax revenues like tax cuts have done in the past.
So Spency-boy publishes an obviously fraudulent chart using irrelevant data and jerm posts a copy. Then neither he or any other denier nitwit will admit to the obvious fraud. In fact jerm continues to use it support his argument which is shit also because it ignores that the oceans contain 94% of the world's heat and have variable currents and surface temperatures because of those currents. jerm, there are these things called oceans. They have a huge influence on our climate. Maybe you didn't know that. Just because the oceans absorbed more heat than predicted over a short term, it does NOT mean the models are broken or that CO2 has ceased to be a greenhouse gas or that the earth has slowed it's warming.
It is true however that the IPCC predictions missed the mark in multiple ways. They underestimated emissions, arctic ice melt, ice sheet melt, sea level rise and failed to predict ocean acidification and ignored tipping points. Basically things are, and will be worse than they predicted. http://wwwp.dailyclimate.org/tdc-newsroom/2012/12/ipcc-prediction-fact-check
Actually the IPCC temp projections are proving to be quite accurate. http://www.skepticalscience.com/contary-to-contrarians-ipcc-temp-projections-accurate.html