There is no problem with the data. The earth is still warming and deniers are more obviously idiots with each data point. Simply put, anyone who does not now believe in AGW is an idiot. A moron. Or a Republican, same thing. You have try to be that stupid.
But there has been for 6 14 18 20 50 100 years. Funny how that works huh? You are so gullible. A sheep. Exxon loves you.
Actually anyone who has looked at the raw data and does not believe in AGW has demonstrated their intelligence and critical thinking skills. AGW is no more a reality than man-made global cooling was in the 1970s. Both are complete political farces not supported by the evidence.
you are a lying drone. 1. how many times do I have to explain to you that has been no warming for 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6,7 , 8, 9, 10. This is a recent quote from one of the top agw nutter scientists: "Dr. James Hansen and Reto Ruedy of NASA GISS have written a paper (non peer reviewed) with a remarkable admission in it. It is titled Global Temperature Update Through 2012. Here is the money quote, which pretty much ends the caterwauling from naysayers about global temperature being stalled for the last decade. The five-year mean global temperature has been flat for the last decade, which we interpret as a combination of natural variability and a slow down in the growth rate of net climate forcing." http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/16/quote-of-the-week-hansen-concedes-the-age-of-flatness/ 2. Also depending on the data set there has been no warming for 18 years. So you see warming over the last 50 100 and 1000 years... but you do not see warming over 20, 000 and 400000 years... why? because there is no discernable warming outside natural variability.
my thoughts from the very beginning. I quit arguing this topic cause i don't care and won't care until they try to tax me for it. Plus the temp records they have are mostly based on models, not even actual recordings. it's just more govt subsidized clowns with nothing better to do who think they are saving the planet. lol and the question they never answer, if we can't stop it, then what the fuck is throwing money at the problem going to achieve?
It is nice to know whether we are warming or cooling, and by how much. But what we really want to know, and don't yet, is whether man's activities are significantly affecting the rate of warming or cooling. There is much new data that must be absorbed and considered. It will take some time to sort this out and putting this question into the political arena is the wrong thing to do. Let the experts sort it out and when there is a broad consensus among experts, not scientists in general, it will be time enough to sit up and take notice. We need to be listening to the climatologists, the meteorologists, and the atmosphere and solar physicists. Let the Politicians keep quiet on this issue until we know more. There was far too much early jumping to conclusions based on far to little information. Initially our observations seemed consistent with the anthropomorphic warming hypothesis of Hanson and others; yet recently major doubts have arisen about the causes of the correlations the early researchers observed. Our Earth's troposphere is affected by the interaction of many factors. It is far to complex a problem to allow for quick answers. Though the issue of possible anthropomorphic influence on the Earth's temperature was raised in the 1980's, only recently have we begun to get the kind of accurate data we need from scientific satellites to begin making real inroads on the problem. It is good to remember that though one has a plethora of observations that are consistent with one's hypothesis, the hypothesis must be rejected if there exists a single inconsistent observation.
Ummmmm, where have you been? You sound very impressive but you are missing a whopper of a fact that makes your post ridiculous. They DO know that man's activities - mostly the burning of FF - is almost entirely responsible for the warming over the last fifty years. There IS a consensus that's nearly unanimous. http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm Plus it's just plain common sense. But maybe your a Republican.