Global Warming Is Dead - RIP AGW

Discussion in 'Politics' started by pspr, May 9, 2013.

  1. jem

    jem

    I think you are going to have to purchase that study if you want to use it.

    The sucker would have made big news if it were all that pro agw.

     
    #51     May 15, 2013
  2. Take a bowling ball in one hand and a ping pong ball in the other. The bowling ball is the earth. The ping pong ball would hold all of the earth's atmosphere, at sea level pressure.
     
    #52     May 15, 2013
  3. pspr

    pspr

    What an idiot. Take a baseball bat and have your queer brother smack you in the head with it until you can think straight.

    We all know there has been no warming for at least 17 years. We also know that CO2 has climbed during that 16 year period and has NOT caused any warming.

    Hence, until and unless the atmosphere (accurately measured) climbs to new highs, GLOBAL WARMING IS OVER.

    Get that through your thick, shrunken head futhercunt.
     
    #53     May 15, 2013

  4. Only an idiot would think that temperatures would go up in a straight line. So of course you do. LOL

    Does this look like global warming is over? Even to a turd blossom like yourself?


    [​IMG]
     
    #54     May 15, 2013
  5. pspr

    pspr

    You are a moron futurecunt. Global Warming is Over. It's is more cooling that is coming. That is obvious.

    AGW Alarmists are shaking in their boots. Their reputations and incomes are in the dumpster. We have been wasting billions of dollars on this Hoax!

    The past 17 years of flat global temperatures are creating a big chill for lots of global warming doom-premised industries.

    Those experiencing cold sweats must certainly include legions of climate scientists who have come to depend upon the many tens of billions of taxpayer bucks for studies that would have little demand without a big crisis for the public to worry about. And that amount pales in comparison with the hundreds of $ billions we spend on generous subsidies, lost tax revenues and inflated consumer costs for otherwise non-competitive “green energy” industries which depend upon those scary climate reports, or the insane economic penalties imposed upon all segments through EPA’s climate-premised regulatory rampage.


    http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...ize-climate-science-and-green-energy-funding/
     
    #55     May 15, 2013
  6. Forbes.....LOL.

    Try NOAA.
     
    #56     May 15, 2013
  7. Don't you realize that Forbes is under the thumb of the FF industry?
     
    #57     May 15, 2013
  8. pspr

    pspr

    Proof? LOL you have none. Forbes is objective but realistic on the science.

    But there is plenty of proof in the ClimateGate emails that show NOAA has manipulated data and stifled dissent on their AGW agenda.

    You can't even show any evidence against the page after page of data and analysis I have presented in this thread.

    You are a denier of the facts, FC.

    This is what the science says today, dumbass.

    <font size=3>Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over. The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of the warming—it was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.

    The PDO cool mode has replaced the warm mode in the Pacific Ocean, virtually assuring us of about 30 years of global cooling, perhaps much deeper than the global cooling from about 1945 to 1977. Just how much cooler the global climate will be during this cool cycle is uncertain. Recent solar changes suggest that it could be fairly severe, perhaps more like the 1880 to 1915 cool cycle than the more moderate 1945-1977 cool cycle. A more drastic cooling, similar to that during the Dalton and Maunder minimums, could plunge the Earth into another Little Ice Age, but only time will tell if that is likely.
    </font>

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/global-cooling-is-here/10783
     
    #58     May 15, 2013
  9. Gee, who has more money, the fossil fuel industry and all of it's related interests or the vast "climate science and green industry" ?

    Come on pisspoor, even a crazed moron like you knows the answer to that one.
     
    #59     May 15, 2013
  10. You haven't presented shit. The data at NOAA and NASA and the Met Office is accurate. You are insane and a sheep.


    The fact is that CO2 levels have gone up 42% in the last 200 years due to man. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. How could that NOT make temps go up? It's a very simple common sense thing......... that the fossil fuel industry doesn't want you to think about. The basics of the science is settled. 97% of the world's climatologists and all the world's science organizations are in agreement about it. The deniers just look foolish now.

    And GW has certainly NOT stopped.
     
    #60     May 15, 2013