Global warming hoax

Discussion in 'Politics' started by james_bond_3rd, Nov 10, 2007.

  1. $20 says you stand in line for harry potter movies.
     
    #61     Nov 14, 2007
  2. you do too. (stand in line for harry potter movies)
     
    #62     Nov 14, 2007
  3. LOL :D
     
    #63     Nov 14, 2007
  4. Sure, if only to scalp tickets to you and your friends.

    Now that we've paid homage to Pee Wee Herman's "I know you are but what am I?" routine, what else you got?
     
    #64     Nov 14, 2007
  5. Take a moment to recognize that ratface is insulting you principally, and me secondarily.

    On the plus side, laughter is good for you.
     
    #65     Nov 14, 2007
  6. Why are you so dense? No really, why do you absolutely refuse to take a look at the WHOLE picture?

    This is why your arguments, whether right or wrong fall flat on their face.

    Ok, let's turn the tables, what is YOUR suggestion? Keep on driving gas guzzling SUVs, completely ignore the environment, forget renewables, ignore any concept of sustainability, and assume that the Earth can handle an infinite amount of humans, demand of natural resources and exhaust? Well? I have yet to have one opponent of Global Warming put up a reasonable case for their side. That alone, whether right or wrong, makes your argument weak & incomplete. In fact, it's barely an argument, just criticism that IS NOT constructive.

    Global warming is not a HOAX. The "hoax" part is that it is being used to drive certain power hungry agenda. Which is how the world spins anyway.

    But here is where your stance falls to sh*t. Your argument is based on denying scientific evidence by finding ones biased toward your argument and basically stating that because we cannot prove 110% that humans cause global warming, let's just throw our hands up in the air and do nothing. Even though anyone with half a brain can quickly observe that humans do affect the immediate ecology of a region and have already destroyed a number of environments. What kind of a logical disconnect does one have to incur to believe that fossil fuel exhaust causes ZERO effect on the environment. It probably happens after breathing the exhausts for a few years.

    P.S. Once again, NO CARBON TAX. It's CAP & TRADE. If you're gonna argue, please do your research. Al Gore has clearly stated that he supports both. The deciding authorities are leaning toward Cap & Trade, because there are more interests pushing for that. Do you even know how CO2 Cap & Trade works or what it is?
     
    #66     Nov 14, 2007
  7. call it whatever you like.. i call it a global carbon tax... i don't give a rat's ass about cap and trade... its all silly. all i have to know is who is behind the movement.. who is funding it and that tells me what i need to know. let me guess, the UN will be the arbiter of all of this? are you for population control too? all the evil humans hurting mother earth? give me a break granola boy.

    environmentalism is funded by the same assholes that are responsible for 90% of the pollution. these are the same ones whining about river mussels but fully support using DU weapons in the middle east. wake up Euell Gibbons. funny how they are also the ones behind suppressing every effort to go towards alternative energy too.
     
    #67     Nov 14, 2007
  8. You, as an example, present a compelling case.
     
    #68     Nov 14, 2007
  9. lol... funny. :eek:
     
    #69     Nov 14, 2007
  10. Once again, you offer no real solution, no clear opposition case. Just like the redneck voting for Bush just because some "Hollywood Librawls" called his state stupid.

    You can't even figure out the difference between a Carbon Tax and a Cap & Trade program. It's quite important. You can only focus on the "bad guys" because you can't accept how the world turns. Gee, Al Gore is actually fulfilling a personal agenda and is actually quite full of sh*t, especially regarding how he has eliminated his "carbon footprint"? You don't say? Wow, is he a politician? I would have never guessed.
    Does not change the fact that his movie was good and gave a good argument.

    Environmentalism is founded by the bad guys? You mean the Native Americans? Do some research, these concepts of conservation & sustainability are centuries old.

    Yes, I am for population control, and have been since I was teenager. Contrary to your belief, not everyones develops these viewpoints from US mass media, far from it. If you take a serious look at the issue, you would understand that the planet cannot sustain a growing population. Sh*t, it's simple math after a while, how many people is enough? Do we keep going till it's the point of no return? Why don't you look up Aaron Russo's opinion on that subject.

    You're conditioned to automatically deny anything that in any way, shape or form has the power hungry elite involved in it, even if its roots are legitimate. Such an ignorant outlook, it's sad. Yeah, it's sooo against human nature to exploit trends, causes & movements for personal gains.
     
    #70     Nov 14, 2007