Global warming hoax fools millions

Is it just me or is this what he really meant?

 

Do you empathize with littledaviedumbass because he's a MMGW poser and I exposed you as a trading poser?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2788731#post2788731

 

Now that I've explained how the appeal to authority fallacy works to Trader666, I'll let you in on a little secret: you're arguing with a textbook. I don't think you'll win.

 

Well davie, like everyone else around here. In MY MIND, I've already won.

 

You ever had an argument with someone who thinks the moon landings were faked? It can be fun, for a while.

 

You mean the fallacy that I schooled you on and you're lying about now.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2979342#post2979342

 

I'll let you in on a little secret, littledaviedumbass... you misunderstood the textbook you plagiarized because you're a dumbass and you didn't read far enough. Not that textbooks are always correct anyway. Yet another fallacious argument from the "big fan of logic."
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2979342#post2979342

But what else would we expect from the one who doesn't even understand basic graphs and axes?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2974933&#post2974933

P.S. Instead of "I don't think you'll win" you should have written "I don't think. You'll win."

 

Look at it this way, maybe there's someone reading who's so profoundly stupid that they buy your nonsense. Keep that hope alive, my friend.

 

Misstating even the basics, fallacious reasoning, lying and plagiarism didn't help you... projection won't either. You really should consider getting an education or learning a trade instead of wasting your time spewing bullshit on ET.

 

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blo...-192334971.html