<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Gm8vaH8LEV0?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Gm8vaH8LEV0?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/640AIJR38Pc?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/640AIJR38Pc?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AJyAQmxIbJk?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AJyAQmxIbJk?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6SRzw-52plg?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6SRzw-52plg?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/naLfstuaBRE?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/naLfstuaBRE?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object> <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tMeuHNgT0PA?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tMeuHNgT0PA?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Burt Rutan is not a climatologist. He also thinks the ozone hole was a hoax. To discredit any one of his arguments just click on any of his arguments in this list: http://scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/2008/07/how_to_talk_to_a_sceptic.php
Not only have I told you several times, it's the TITLE of the chart. What part of "severe winters" don't you understand? Littledaviedumbass is the Baghdad Bob of global warming <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TrXhxmQJSS0?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TrXhxmQJSS0?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
To discredit the IPCC, just click here: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2972896#post2972896
Unlike littledaviedumbass. Tell us again about graphs and y-axis labels, Davie "I need to ignore the fact that there are three lines and three different y-axis labels (which is a big no-no in statistics, as anyone familiar with statistics would recognize) " http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2966248&#post2966248
Lest anyone was actually going to believe that particular falsehood that Trader 666 linked to, here's a quote fromHulme, the guy who (the article claimed) said that man-made global warming was only supported by a few dozen experts and misleads people: "I did not say the âIPCC misleadsâ anyone â it is claims that are made by other commentators, such as the caricatured claim I offer in the paper, that have the potential to mislead." -- Mike Hulme http://deepclimate.org/2010/06/15/mike-hulme-sets-lawrence-solomon-and-marcmorano-straight/ On to your next falsehood, Trader666! I'm sure this won't even slow you down.
LMAO! Hulme issued two hilarious backpedaling "clarifications" after he got nailed for slipping and telling the truth. Instead of your pro-hoax website, let's look at a few original documents from Hulme and the IPCC. The first is what Hulme originally wrote and the source is his website. I've highlighted the "2500" number and his acknowledgment that consensus in IPCC reports is normally reached by "only a few dozen experts." Without a careful explanation about what it means, this drive for consensus can leave the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism. Claims such as '2,500 of the world's leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate' are disingenuous. That particular consensus judgement, as are many others in the IPCC reports, is reached by only a few dozen experts in the specific field of detection and attribution studies; other IPCC authors are experts in other fields. http://mikehulme.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Hulme-Mahony-PiPG.pdf Where did that "2500" number come from? The IPCC used to claim or imply a consensus that large all the time. For example, here's a slide from a 2007 IPCC briefing given by the IPCC Chairman no less. Source for this is the IPCC's website: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/valencia-2007-11/pachauri-17-november-2007.pdf
See? It didn't even slow you down, you just recite another "selective" quotation. The problem is, that according to you he's lying now, which makes him a liar. Which means you just cited a liar. On to your next falsehood! What will it be next? We're all waiting in anticipation! Here's his original statement: http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X13...0/01/Correcting-reports-of-the-PiPG-paper.pdf Here's Hulme's entire correction of the false newspaper report: http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X13...0/01/Correcting-reports-of-the-PiPG-paper.pdf
Of course all you can do is desperately try to obfuscate. I say "try" because you can't even post correct links. I posted an excerpt from Hulme's original document and gave the link from his website... it's no coincidence that IPCC had been using the number "2500" and I gave a link to that too from IPCC's website. Keep trying littledaviedumbass... your ignorance makes you the perfect pawn for the IPCC's lies.