If we could count on our supreme court to uphold our constitution we'd be living in a very different country right now...
So all government funding of research should be stopped because its not specifically mentioned in the constitution? Where does that leave the 'internet?
But the tea party candidates who call the 'separation of church and state' as something invented by Hitler will be upholding the constitution right?
The penis washing wasn't research. It was an initiative to teach men how to wash their penises. It cost nearly a million dollars. I don't see any part of the constitution which allows for government to use taxpayer money for such initiatives. Yes, it should be stopped.
Then run for office and have the regulations changed. Don't tell me, there's a conspiracy against that, too.
Too? What are you talking about? Did I proclaim the existence of some conspiracy? Are you confusing conversations? What's with the sudden loss of coherence?
It was conducted by 'the National Institutes of Health (NIH), The studyâs lead investigator Dr. Thomas J. Coates was the fourth highest-funded researcher in the country in 2002 and is currently conducting HIV research on three continents.âWe propose to evaluate the feasibility of a post-coital genital hygiene study among men unwilling to be circumcised in Orange Farm, South Africa.â' And 'internet' research can be rephrased as a mode to 'send and receive pornography across different geographical locations' since most of the internet is pornography.
The Supreme Court, you tell us, won't read your briefs on how funding HIV prevention is unconstitutional because they're not defending the constitution. That, to me, is the description of a conspiracy. The other possibility is that you have some secret knowledge of what is constitutional that they don't possess.