i swear some of these guys must have been educated at bob jones university: "if conclusions contradict the word of God, the conclusions are wrong no matter how many scientific facts may appear to back them."biology textbook printed by conservative Christian publisher Bob Jones University Press
a general distrust of science is related to religion. years of preachers declaring science anti god because if falsifies the bible is starting to have profound effects.
No. No. No. Liberals will never again be able to hold the banner of science. They are too ignorant to see that the global warming hoax was not science. They can't see that even after you show them the internal emails on how it was fixed.
Not necesarily, but in this the the so called "data" being used by Gore and co. is obviously altered to suite an agenda. Reinforcing for me anyway doubts about the whole MMGW claims. Of course true believers will try to ignore the scandal/bury their collective heads in the sand. Although to some extent it's human nature to ignore/avoid information that challenges preconceived notions. If MM global warming/climate change is real, then why the need to hide and or manipulate data? Wouldn't any true scientist simply report the results whatever they happen to be and admit their previous theory may be wrong? Why are MMGW proponents almost universally associated with liberalism and the "distribute the wealth and destroy America" crowd? If meteorologist/climatologist can't accurately predict the weather a week from now, how TF do they supposedly know what's going to be happening decades from now? (They don't) Why are we supposed to get snow Friday when it hardly ever snows here? Why does our dog keep peeing in the house? Is it happy hour yet? What kind of beer do you drink? You gonna be getting any tonight? (I am)
But then you seem to think EVERYTHING is related to religion. Does anyone else besides me find that odd? Keep fighting the good fight vhehn, you've only got about 6 1/2 billion people left to educate.
why do you think most anti science people are more religious? why do you think most scientists are not religious. if you are religious you most likely believe: 1. evolution is not true. 2. the earth warming is not true. 3. an unseen deity in the sky made man out of dirt. 4. a great flood once covered the earth to the highest montian depth. 5. praying will heal you. 6. almost 50% of americans believe this statement:God created man pretty much in his present form at one time within the last 10,000 years. how else do you explain the fundamental lack of understanding that the religious have than it is something to do with their indoctrination?
Personally I think your making some self serving ego stroking broad assumptions here. Not everyone who practices a religion is necesarily anti science. In fact there are plenty of things scientist, religious or not, don't know or agree on. So whose to say which way the average Joe is supposed to lean in those cases? 1. I'm not practicing any religion and yet I have serious doubts about evolution, at least as it's presented. I have no doubt some evolution of orgasms takes place over time. But when I look at the so called fossil record showing one species supposedly morphing into another that in no way resembles the prior one with absolutely no "record" of anything in between. I naturally have to be a little skeptical. I mean is there no limit to the guessing and unfounded speculation "science" is willing to make to fill in the blanks they don't have evidence or answers for? 2.I know you've been busy defending the honor of science and all, but have you heard of Climate Gate? Apparently a bunch of so called men of science were cooking the books so to speak to support their agenda. BTW does that sound like something a real scientist would do to you? 3.I can't say as I've personally seen this deity and I certainly wasn't around when the alleged creation took place. But given that according to YOU the, mostly religious, masses have dirt for brains. Is it really that implausible? 4. If I'm not mistaken there is evidence of one or more very large floods in ancient times. Given their limited knowledge of the world at the time it's only natural that they thought the whole world was under water and that that would be the story passed down to later generations. 5. Well it never healed me, fortunately for me I don't get sick often. I have heard and read of "miracles". Seems to me even the most skeptical science oriented guy would at least have to pause to consider all the possibilities. Can you claim to be open minded and objective otherwise? 6.Again I wasn't around 10,000 years ago. (Although sometimes it feels like I was) If I had to guess, I'd go with the truth being somewhere in between 10K and 5 billion years ago. But that's just me and frankly at the end of the day. It doesn't seem to affect me much one way or the other. One mans education is another mans indoctrination. If one agrees with you there educated, if not they're indoctrinated. Reminds me of a joke. "Ever notice how everyone driving faster than you is a manic, and everyone driving slower than you is an idiot?"