What's really interesting is absolutely nobody is surprised, even in the smallest way. It's a lot like everybody already knew this was just cover - we weren't fighting about global warming any more than we were fighting about global cooling. It was about the same things it always has been about - freedom, Capitalism and individual rights over "collective" rights. This is only news since it's clear evidence, but every one of us has known this for a long time.
Every hacker everywhere in the world should try to get more of these secret files. Couldn't hurt. The global warming hoaxsters say the current emails haven't hurt their case in the least. I believe hacker websites steer you toward the tools where you can get more of these docs.
========================== Well suprise, suprise, now we find out more ice is forming than melting. Cool. I am suprised that you did not call it climate change plan; now the weather & political climate[Copenhagen] has changed/cooled .LOL Good plan. Cool plan, thank God. But some''planners'' may proclaim victory anyway; planting one tree can cool things down a bit,funny but true.
Crushing dissent was a VERY important part of the global warming hoax (see below). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574559630382048494.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Much less stable ice for polar bears, expert says Survey by ship finds satellite data about thicker Arctic ice was wrong updated 4:56 p.m. MT, Fri., Nov . 27, 2009 ice conditions are even worse than feared after a survey found that ice detected as older and thicker by satellites is actually thin and fragile, a prominent Canadian researcher reported Friday. University of Manitoba researcher David Barber said experts around the world believed the ice was recovering because satellite images showed it expanding, but the thick, multiyear frozen sheets have been replaced by thin ice that cannot support the weight of a polar bear. "Polar bears are being restricted to a small fringe of where this multiyear sea ice is. As we went further and further north, we saw less and less polar bears because this ice wasn't even strong enough for the polar bears to stand on," said Barber, who returned from an expedition to the Beaufort Sea in September. Barber said permanent ice, which is normally up to 30 feet thick, was easily pierced by the research icebreaker he and his team were on. Multiyear sea ice used to cover 90 percent of the Arctic basin, Barber said. It now covers roughly 19 percent. Where it used to be up to 33 feet thick, it's now 6 feet at most. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34176463/ns/us_news-environment?GT1=43001
Global Warming Fraud and the Future of Science November 29, 2009 "The Arctic Ice Melt. We've been informed for the better part of a decade that Arctic ice was melting at an unprecedented rate, and that the North Pole would be ice-free in twenty, thirty, or forty years, depending in the hysteria level of the media platform in question. In truth, ice thinning was due to a cyclical weather pattern in which winds blow ice floes south into warmer water. Everybody involved knew that this cycle occurred, everyone had seen it happen previously time out of mind. But it was too good an opportunity to pass up. Worse yet, when the weather returned to its normal pattern two years ago, large numbers of scientists put in considerable effort to suggest that the "new" ice was thinner than usual and would vanish in a flash as soon as the temperatures went back up. The media went along with the joke. The Germans have a phrase to cover such eventualities: this crew should be stripped of their trade. (Several expeditions setting out for the Pole to "call attention" to the coming Arctic catastrophe had to stop short due to icy conditions. In one case, both women involved suffered serious frostbite.) The Poor Polar Bears. Closely related is the saga of the polar bears, staring extinction in the face due to warming while, somewhere beyond the aurora, Gaia weeps bitter tears. This was evidently inspired by a single photograph (you've seen it -- the entire world has at this point) of a woebegone polar bear crouched on a melting iceberg. That bear had to be sulking over allowing a nice juicy seal to escape, because it was in no danger. Out of the twenty major polar bear populations only two are known to be decreasing. Estimates of bear population (there are no exact figures) have increased over the past forty years, from 17,000 to19,000 to the current number of 22,000 to 27,000. The bears are becoming pests in municipalities such as Churchill and Point Barrow. (As clearly shown here.) Despite all this, last year the bear was put on the U.S. "endangered" list." http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/global_warming_fraud_and_the_f.html
From the article: "Foreign to the outside world". In other words, it doesn't mean what it says. Up means down, wrong means right and delete means save forever: They really think people are gullible. And it's easy to understand why, look at how successful they've been in perpetrating this hoax.
Sorry mate, real men have just gotten back from the arctic: http://www.canada.com/technology/Arctic+meltdown+remains+severe+report/2276659/story.html I recall it was a few years (decades?) ago that scientists, or perhaps mere engineers, were showing mathematical proof that bumblebees could not fly.