HE'S CLEARLY AN UNQUALIFIED INDUSTRY WHORE and the piece is shit, AND YOU KNOW IT......LIAR Jem, are you being compensated to argue about this? Because this is the BS that a fossil fuel funded right wing think tank operative would say.
Just learned a bit of the followings today. It seems we don't really know where the CO2 goes Yet!? So the whole issue about CO2 could be still a Mystery???! Especially we don't really know the rate of removing CO2 by various sinks!!!? We couldn't measure the removal rates!? Maybe the different sinks mentioned below can sink/consume as much CO2 as possible by creating more natural hurricanes or something (rains? winds?), just like a re-balancing process to reset the overall CO2 back to a reasonable level as considered by the Nature?! Winds might be useful for helping CO2/etc to flow from a high density location to a low density location?! ??? Just 2 cents!
New reactor technology for fusion energy. http://www.sciencealert.com/hydrogen-boron-nuclear-sphere-revolutionise-fusion-energy They found that a strange-looking sphere design could be the key to achieving net-positive nuclear fusion because, surprisingly, it has the potential to generate more energy than it uses. The key difference, aside from its shape, is that this nuclear sphere would fuse hydrogen and boron, rather than hydrogen isotopes such as deuterium and tritium. And it uses lasers to heat the core up to 200 times hotter than the centre of the Sun. If the team's calculations are correct, the hydrogen-boron reactor device could be built and producing net-positive energy way before any of the reactors currently being tested reach completion. Even better, the hydrogen-boron reaction produces no neutrons, and therefore doesn't create any radioactive waste as a byproduct. "It is a most exciting thing to see these reactions confirmed in recent experiments and simulations," says lead researcher Heinrich Hora, from the University of New South Wales in Australia.
you are such a troll. these are real climate science degrees. you have no basis for saying he is not qualified other than the fact you are a troll who hates anyone who has a different opinions. James Edward Kamis is a Geologist and AAPG member of 41 years and who has always been fascinated by the connection between Geology and Climate. Years of research and observation have convinced him that the Earth’s Heat Flow Engine, which drives the outer crustal plates, is also an important driver of the Earth’s climate. He received a BS in Geology from Northern Illinois University in 1973 and an MS in Geology from Idaho State University in 1976
"BS" jerm, you DO know that's not as good as a doctorate right. Of course you do. GEOLOGY jerm, you DO know that's not climate science right ? Of course you do. RETIRED WORKED FOR OIL COMPANIES jerm, you DO know that means he is biased right? NOT A CLIMATOLOGIST So you know he's not an expert in these matters right? Yes you do. IT'S NOT PUBLISHED IN A PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL, IT'S ON HIS OWN WEBPAGE so it has no credibility You know this also. But still you put this out there as if it's real science. IT ISN'T and either you know it and are a liar, or you are much dumber than I thought you were. Which you are not. You are just a fucking liar. Are you being compensated to lie like this ?
you crazy demented ignorant troll. geology is one of the fields of study within "climate science". Not only can you look it up by going to google.com...you would think that would almost be self evident or obvious to anyone but a troll. now if you wish to call the guy biased fine.. if getting paid creates a biased scientist than almost all you guys are biased too. but acting like a geologist can not be a climate scientists is far more ignorant than I would have expected... even from you. finally if you look it up... a phd is not required to be a climatologist on the websites I reviewed. decades of experience and a masters degree would seem to make this guy far more qualified than most.
Typical crap source from you. You can't lie without them. Not even peer reviewed. By someone with a lowly BS in geo, that's an industry whore. And you wonder why I call you a liar.
When placing a very large ice block on the surface of a much larger icy base, it would be easy to simulate and observe how various forms and ways for man-made changes of temperature surrounding the ice block affect the melting shape and form of the ice block. The breaking off of ice shelf into two pieces, no matter where the starting point is, should be almost impossible due to mainly/solely the (atmospheric) changes of its surrounding temperatures. Could above possibility a common-sense and logical deduction?! Perhaps we Do need to see a simulated physically constructed experiment to provide and prove a fairly similar result equivalent to the breaking off of ice shelf! ? Otherwise, it could be still a huge mystery to be explained scientifically. I'd be very surprised to learn that if no such kind of experiments or reports has been known/ published to the public Yet! ?
It's Colder Than Mars Out There The arctic freeze over the United States this week is producing the kind of frigid temperatures typical for the red planet. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/12/cold-weather-united-states-mars/549386/