The onus is on your side bub. Your side can’t produce anything to confirm that man made CO2 causes warming of catastrophic proportion. There are, however, hundreds of skeptic papers and other peer review articles that show other forces at play. Maybe Bill Nye the Mechanical Engineer Guy knows?? LOL!
Why Deming's theory does like target? One of the reasons can be found in J-Curve. People without proper knowledge can find ways unknowingly to attain a required target (in terms of level, rate, timing, etc.) with easy short-term actions by sacrificing/avoiding long-term adverse outcomes! A CEO may be more/just concerned with this current year's performance/bonus, but a chairman should not!
So then you don't believe that CO2 is a greenhouse gas? I'm just trying to figure out how stupid you really are.
https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/global-warming-for-experts-only.312895/page-54 As a very primitive layman having absolutely minimum knowledge in climate change, I would like to view the issue with my own ways, wrong or right or in-between that I could never know for sure. 1. What do we want from our living environment for our well-being? We then further define what we don't want for the adverse conditions in our environment that would cause our unhappiness in general. 2. One thing I am pretty sure is as mentioned before weather volatility having extreme high and extreme low temperatures for an extended period of time that would easily cause a huge number of human deaths due to our infrastructure is never prepared for this kind of situations. Just like suddenly people are dropped into into the middle of bush fire or frozen antarctic poles without any logistics supplying any food or water for an extended period of time. 3. Whenever any unknowingly existing causes that would put us into that similar kinds of deadly scenarios, we could call them slow-dead causes and deadly effects. Many times, dynamic feedback loops would exist between any of the slow-dead causes and any of the deadly effects during the development process. 4. Personally I would believe CO2 could be Neither of the two kinds. Because CO2 might be useful for naturally and automatically adjusting our living environment merely according to the input conditions. And the outcome would be simply the effectiveness of performing this expected /assigned function given by the nature. When the surrounding conditions are very poor, the CO2 cannot dutifully perform its assumed task. And more CO2 would stay in our environment. Therefore, CO2 is a measure (as mentioned before) of the health of our environment. I think CO2 alone does not generate heat by itself. Something else generates/absorbs heat to cause temperature higher or lower. 5. ... ... Just 2 cents - layman's cents (PS: Don't be serious! Only suitable for brainstorming purpose)!
NINE YEARS AGO… Al Gore Predicted North Pole Would Be Completely Ice Free by Today http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12...edicted-north-pole-completely-ice-free-today/
Probably the climate change models are not better than our trading models, unsure which one is based on curve fitting and which one is not. The Great Blizzard of 1978 forced people to abandon their cars on a Massachusetts highway. [Image Credit: Jim McDevitt Photographer/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | CC O]
Looks like the seas should be the focus, and the sea level should be the best measure! Very interesting, but it's logical and reasonable! The top graph shows that Earth’s surface temperatures are susceptible to influences like the Pacific Ocean, and can rise and fall off for years or decades at time (within the greater warming trend). The bottom graph depicts global sea level, which is not as susceptible to the influences on Earth’s surface. Global sea level rise is the true global warming curve, says NASA’s Patzert. [Image Credit: NASA | CC 0]
Plummeting temperatures could send the world into a 'mini ice age' in 2030 and could OVERRIDE global warming, claim mathematicians Temperatures will start dropping in 2021, according to a mathematical model This, they say, will lead to a phenomenon known as the 'Maunder minimum' This was previously known as a mini ice age when it hit between 1646 and 1715 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ing-temperatures-cause-mini-ice-age-2030.html In a little over a decade the world could be plunged into a 'mini ice age', scientists have warned. Temperatures will start dropping in 2021, according to a mathematical model of the Sun's magnetic energy. This, they say, will lead to a phenomenon known as the 'Maunder minimum' - which has previously been known as a mini ice age when it hit between 1646 and 1715, even causing London's River Thames to freeze over. (More at above url)
Based on the above information from previous posts, I can imagine a model. The overall ocean is the block box, with one deadly effect - volatile temperature, due to some slow-death causes including sea contents as a common cause and perhaps cosmic rays as a special cause. We might be running out of time and lack of technology to reverse the adverse situation of sea contents such as micro-beads and others. Beyond a point of no-return. Perhaps inevitable! I hope it's not. However, we should be able to slow down and control the range of volatility through improving sea-water quality in order to smooth the extreme high and low temperatures, imo. As the side effect measured by ever-rising sea-level, we should better prepare contingency plans. People living in below sea-level grounds should move completely to higher grounds, especially after destruction by hurricanes. Leave the below-sea-level grounds as wet lands for wild life animals and man-made lakes/canals. imo, re-built after hurricanes at the original below-sea-level grounds could be an unreasonable decision in long run, considering ever-rising sea-level. Any new infrastructure on land/ground close to coast should be designed/catered to meet rising sea-level scenarios. With many wet lands, lakes and canals. Floating cities should be also wisely considered/implemented. Less than 2 cents! lol A rendering of the Floating Island Project in French Polynesia. Blue Frontiers will build and operate the islands, with the goal of building about a dozen by 2020, including homes, hotels, offices and restaurants, at a cost of about $60 million. Credit Blue Frontiers The Lower Ninth Ward in New Orleans, one of the areas worst hit by Hurricane Katrina, in 2015. New Orleans now has the largest flood barrier in the world. Photograph: Carlos Barria/Reuters https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/sep/08/hurricane-irma-harvey-katrina-houston-how-to-rebuild
so when cooling overwhelms warming... you have global cooling. but don't worry the data will be adjusted up to fit the nutters needs.