fundamental science is in a lab is one thing. we have fundamental experimental science by NASA showing co2 also has cooling properties. whether adding additional man made co2 warms or cools is a much more complicated question than fundamental science. The earth has a very dynamic complex system with negative feedbacks. And perhaps the most important feedback we have right now is clouds and we don't know the answer to co2 impact on clouds. . we don't know... we are waiting for the scientists to figure out how clouds impact warming and cooling and if an how co2 impacts clouds. Then we can begin to figure out what man made co2 is doing. for instance co2 could warm. But the amount of co2 in the lower atmosphere could be governed by temperature and any additional co2 could be off gassed or synced.
but go ahead prove I'm lying you troll. but please explain how do you have the balls to lie about science which I have showed you probably one hundred times by now. see the blue line.. that is temperature. it leads the tan line up and down... that is co2. many peer reviewed studies confirm that co2 lags. i have shown you the studies over and over.
You are unable to understand or properly debate science so you just call other people liars and other names while continually re-posting the same nonsense hundreds of times like a retarded parrot. Completely absurd.
No, I call people liars that are clearly liars. You aren't a liar, just an ignorant stubborn deluded dickhead. Still waiting for ANY science debate from you............... dickhead.
Q Climate Myth... Human CO2 is a tiny % of CO2 emissions “The oceans contain 37,400 billion tons (GT) of suspended carbon, land biomass has 2000-3000 GT. The atpmosphere contains 720 billion tons of CO2 and humans contribute only 6 GT additional load on this balance. The oceans, land and atpmosphere exchange CO2 continuously so the additional load by humans is incredibly small. A small shift in the balance between oceans and air would cause a CO2 much more severe rise than anything we could produce.” (Jeff Id) UQ Figure 1: Global carbon cycle. Numbers represent flux of carbon dioxide in gigatons (Source: Figure 7.3, IPCC AR4). Basic rebuttal written by GPWayne Figure 2: Annual global CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning and cement manufacture in GtC yr?1 (black), annual averages of the 13C/12C ratio measured in atmospheric CO2 at Mauna Loa from 1981 to 2002 (red). ). The isotope data are expressed as ?13C(CO2) ‰ (per mil) deviation from a calibration standard. Note that this scale is inverted to improve clarity. (IPCC AR4) Intermediate rebuttal written by John Cook