if climate change denial is religious could you show us some peer reviewed science that says man made co2 is causing warming? Because if anyone exhibits faith its those arguing man made co2 causes warming without any science. Note, I did not ask for science which shows co2 has warming properties (because we also know it has cooling properties).
ass over tits. Not how science works What there aren't, are any peer reviewed scientific papers, published or not, to counter the very large amount of published peer reviewed scientific papers, which explain how anthropic CO2 is causing warming. Funny thing. There are also those who say there are no published peer reviewed scientific papers, which explain how space-time curvature causes gravity .
Actually there is not a single peer-reviewed paper which claims that anthropic CO2 causes global warming which is dangerous to mankind. If there is one... then please provide a link to it.
Actually there probably isn't a single peer-reviewed paper which claims that spacetime curvature causes gravity which is dangerous to mankind either. Perhaps they're just the kind of things that are screamingly f'kng apparent if one's being sensible about what's dangerous to mankind from the worst effects of a greenhouse gas like anthropic CO2 , or worst effects of a force like gravity, simply going by what's known about their very nature alone.
show us some science stu... post a link to the large amount of papers... or we will know you were lying about science again. "the very large amount of published peer reviewed scientific papers, which explain how anthropic CO2 is causing warming." by the way there no evidence that co2 causes warming because all the data shows it trails warming and cooling. so if you found anything it would be speculation based on models. Scientists use models to speculate that co2 might amplify the warming once the warming starts. Which may be true. But, after a lot of co2 is released it may start cooling. NASA experiments show co2 also cools. This is again why there is no science showing man man co2 causes warming. There is no data to support that finding.
NASA says it's a greenhouse gas, that warms. Or are you trying to re-define what "greenhouse gas" means? You, like piehole, are one of those lying scumbags. The kind that will help cause death and destruction from man made global warming. Go fuck yourself.
You troll liar Fraudcurrents. Here NASA states CO2 is also a very powerful coolant and proves it with this experiment. are up denying that CO2 also cools. https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/ finally we don't even know that more co2 is bad. We need more food to feed 7 billion people. and the oceans have been rising since the last ice age...
Yes, I know what they say. They say it is a greenhouse that - on balance - warms and without it the earth would be much much colder. Or do you deny that also, you lying piece of shit.
point to the science in peer reviewed papers that proves your statement and then using that paper and others I will explain why we are currently unsure what adding more co2 does in our environment. We might actually get somewhere if you start producing peer reviewed science to establish your statements. hint there are few if any papers showing co2 causes warming which don't rely on models. One paper admits that warming comes before co2 and then speculates that once the warming started co2 increased the warming.
Yet more evidence that piehole works for a libertarian think tank. If anyone wants to know what Shaviv is really all about.... https://www.desmogblog.com/nir-shaviv And still, not a single example of a publishing climate scientist denying man made globa warming. "He (Shaviv) does stress anthropogenic causes will most likely be the dominant driver of warming in the 21st century. "