Global warming: Don't distort my data, says scientist

james_bond_3rd · Jul 27, 2006

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/27/o...66cbf5101&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

IN the debate on global warming, the data on the climate of Antarctica has been distorted, at different times, by both sides.
...
My research colleagues and I found that from 1986 to 2000, one small, ice-free area of the Antarctic mainland had actually cooled. Our report also analyzed temperatures for the mainland in such a way as to remove the influence of the peninsula warming and found that, from 1966 to 2000, more of the continent had cooled than had warmed. Our summary statement pointed out how the cooling trend posed challenges to models of Antarctic climate and ecosystem change.
...
In a rebuttal in The Providence Journal, in Rhode Island, the lead author of the Science paper and I explained that our studies offered no evidence that the earth was cooling. But the misinterpretation had already become legend, and in the four and half years since, it has only grown.
...
Our study did find that 58 percent of Antarctica cooled from 1966 to 2000. But during that period, the rest of the continent was warming. And climate models created since our paper was published have suggested a link between the lack of significant warming in Antarctica and the ozone hole over that continent. These models, conspicuously missing from the warming-skeptic literature, suggest that as the ozone hole heals â thanks to worldwide bans on ozone-destroying chemicals â all of Antarctica is likely to warm with the rest of the planet. An inconvenient truth?
...
I would like to remove my name from the list of scientists who dispute global warming. I know my coauthors would as well.
More...

Log in or Sign up

Global warming: Don't distort my data, says scientist

james_bond_3rd