Global Macro Trading Journal

Discussion in 'Journals' started by Daal, Feb 25, 2011.

  1. Very well... I think we should agree to disagree on this for now and let everything evolve in the fullness of time.

    BTW, it may be more interesting, but also easier and less contentious, to discuss all these issues in the context of the RCG Sequoia Fund, instead of PS.
     
    #5871     Apr 5, 2016
  2. pacers

    pacers

    Martinghoul,

    I see you are completely opposed to the use of Kelly or Optimal F. In your opinion which are the better rules to go by?
     
    #5872     Apr 5, 2016
  3. No, I am not at all opposed, since it's horses for courses, so to speak. I am only suggesting that, if one uses these methods, one should be consistent and diligent in their application.

    As to my personal preference, I use a different approach for my risk decisions, since I operate under a variety of constraints other than leverage. Basically, it becomes a relatively complicated linear optimization problem.

    For a pretty decent, but brief exploration of the application of Kelly, you could do a lot worse than this:
    http://epchan.blogspot.com/2006/10/how-much-leverage-should-you-use.html
     
    #5873     Apr 5, 2016
  4. pacers

    pacers

    Since I am into math, would you mind (if you got the time) explain your approach and methodology? I believe it would give me a good perspective of the actual methodologies used inside hedge funds.
     
    #5874     Apr 5, 2016
  5. It's kinda tough to explain, tbh, since it has a lot of inputs. Basically, the idea is that you need to maximize your ex ante Sharpe ratio, while minimizing the use of scarce resources. When I talk about scarce resources, I am referring to the various constraints, such as VAR, leverage (however you define it), stress exposure, unwind cost, etc etc etc. So like I said, it's a large and somewhat hand-wavy linear optimization problem. You can impose some limited structure on the process, but full-blown automation is really out of the question.
     
    #5875     Apr 5, 2016
  6. pacers

    pacers

    Cool. Thanks for the clarification.
     
    #5876     Apr 5, 2016
  7. Daal

    Daal

    I was thinking that exact thing. That fund, its just clear cut. They violated your principles and they guy running it risked his career in an investment he fell in love with. As a result he got fired and now the fund is extremely vulnerable to an avalanche of redemptions should the SPX drop 10% or so. I don't think they got any gates
     
    #5877     Apr 5, 2016
  8. Daal

    Daal

    Since we are on the subject, which other papers, articles, books do you recommend on the subject of risk management?
     
    #5878     Apr 5, 2016
  9. Moreover, there are now 3 lawsuits pending (most recent one not directly targeting RCG)...
     
    #5879     Apr 5, 2016
  10. Well, firstly, I won't recommend the obvious, such as stuff by Taleb.

    I am a big fan of Aaron Brown. While it's not perfect, I think his book "Red-Blooded Risk" is very insightful in a lot of ways.
     
    #5880     Apr 6, 2016