My post did not mention Trump nor did I label anyone as extreme. I pointed out why the sort of "reasonable compromise" you seek on gun control is impossible. I pointed out that the gun controllers see anything short of confiscation as merely another step toward their end goal. Your reply was to attack me as a name caller.
Good thing we needn't justify anything to you. I like the direction that things are going since DJT took office.
The family that owns a car increases the chance of dying in a car, too vs. the family that does not and walks everywhere.
No, you just say there should be regulated access to guns preventing law abiding citizens from easy access to their firearms while criminals roam free with theirs. That's the number one issue I have.
No, citizens can have all the guns they want to fight off the roving mobs of criminals that must live near you. Just not handguns. They are not needed and are too easily concealed and are responsible for the most gun deaths. After hnadguns are banned, fewer and fewer will be in the hands of criminals and crazies.
Right. So when I take the wife for a night on the town and we take a walk I can't carry because hand guns are dangerous. But criminals can carry. Brilliant.
No, they won't, because I am armed. That's the whole point. It is telling that you desire a world where criminals can steal all they want from an unarmed populace, though. And this is why your gun laws will never pass - because you cannot win over anyone on the other side due to the inability to critically think, to be reasonable and to provide balanced laws that actually have a chance of working outside of a fantasy world of rainbows and unicorn farts.
Yes, carrying is moronic. It's for scared right wingers with that over active amygdala and they can't think logically. Good point.