https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...book_suppressed_hunter_biden_revelations.html Does this explain why Facebook suppressed Hunter Biden revelations? The moment the New York Post reported on some of the sleazy, corrupt details contained on Hunter Biden’s hard drive, Twitter and Facebook, the social media giants most closely connected to the way Americans exchange political information, went into overdrive to suppress the information and protect Joe Biden. In the case of Facebook, though, perhaps one of those protectors was, in fact, protecting herself. The person currently in charge of Facebook’s election integrity program is Anna Makanju. That name probably doesn’t mean a lot to you, but it should mean a lot – and in a comforting way -- to Joe Biden. Before ending up at Facebook, Makanju was a nonresident Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council. The Atlantic Council is an ostensibly non-partisan think tank that deals with international affairs. In fact, it’s a decidedly partisan organization. In 2009, James L. Jones, the Atlantic Council’s chairman left the organization to be President Obama’s National Security Advisor. Susan Rice, Richard Holbrooke, Eric Shinseki, Anne-Marie Slaughter, Chuck Hagel, and Brent Scowcroft also were all affiliated with the Atlantic Council before they ended up in the Obama administration. The Atlantic Council has received massive amounts of foreign funding over the years. Here’s one that should interest everyone: Burisma Holdings donated $300,000 dollars to the Atlantic Council, over the course of three consecutive years, beginning in 2016. The information below may explain why it began paying that money to the Council. Not only was the Atlantic Council sending people into the Obama-Biden administration, but it was also serving as an outside advisor. And that gets us back to Anna Makanju, the person heading Facebook’s misleadingly titled “election integrity program.” Makanju also worked at the Atlantic Council. The following is the relevant part of Makanju’s professional bio from her page at the Atlantic Council (emphasis mine): Makanju was a player in the faux Ukraine impeachment. Early in December 2019, when the Democrats were gearing up for the impeachment, Glenn Kessler mentioned her in an article assuring Washington Post readers that, contrary to the Trump administration’s claims, there was nothing corrupt about Biden’s dealings with Ukraine. He made the point then that Biden now raises as a defense: Biden didn’t pressure Ukraine to fire prosecutor Viktor Shokin to protect Burisma; he did it because Shokin wasn’t doing his job when it came to investigating corruption. Kessler writes that, on the same day in February 2016 that then-Ukrainian President Poroshenko announced that Shokin had offered his resignation, Biden spoke to both Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk. The White House version is that Biden gave both men pep talks about reforming the government and fighting corruption. And that’s where Makanju comes in: Anna Makanju, Biden’s senior policy adviser for Ukraine at the time, also listened to the calls and said release of the transcripts would only strengthen Biden’s case that he acted properly. She helped Biden prepare for the conversations and said they operated at a high level, with Biden using language such as Poroshenko’s government being “nation builders for a transformation of Ukraine.” A reference to a private company such as Burisma would be “too fine a level of granularity” for a call between Biden and the president of another country, Makanju told The Fact Checker. Instead, she said, the conversation focused on reforms demanded by the International Monetary Fund, methods to tackle corruption and military assistance. An investigation of “Burisma was just not significant enough” to mention, she said. Let me remind you, in case you forgot, that Burisma started paying the Atlantic Council a lot of money in 2016, right when Makanju was advising Biden regarding getting rid of Shokin. In other words, there’s a really good chance that Sundance was correct when he wrote at The Conservative Treehouse: That’s right folks, the Facebook executive currently blocking all of the negative evidence of Hunter and Joe Biden’s corrupt activity in Ukraine is the same person who was coordinating the corrupt activity between the Biden family payoffs and Ukraine. Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...d_hunter_biden_revelations.html#ixzz6bH2xoUFm Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
LOL. The Senate Report. Swamp dwellers. The Senate Report was garbage. It shows no proof of collusion or conspiracy, in fact it completely contradicts its own findings within the report. It spends much of the time talking about the Steele Dossier's claims in depth (not adding anything new to it, just discussing it) -- then at the end of the document concludes by saying the Steele Dossier was BS.
Don't bother with that guy(and his few sidekicks). He is either a shill or already brainwashed by the media. No amount of factual reasoning will change their thinking. If you present a neutral observer with such damning corroborated evidence, most will agree that Joe Biden does have serious integrity issues.
Of course. They’ve been wrong for years and years. Lying their asses off. Their hate for the bad orange man has consumed their pathetic worthless lives. SUCH LOSERS.
They are all just echoes of themselves. The never ending story. Round and round and round we go. Where we stop? Who knows?
I used to dislike Trump because of what the media reports, but after the repeated biased headlines against Trump I decided to dig deeper and read both sides out of curiousity. It was an eye opener. It is crazy the extent media propaganda can be used to shape opinion. If Trump does get re-elected, it is a major victory. That would mean he battled and won against the traditional media, the widely used social media, the foreign sponsored entities, the deep-state and the Republicans.
No Comrade, I wasn't going to say that. I was planning to gently remind you of what you actually said, Conrade, which was ... that "he [George Kent] had repeatedly warned his superiors in DC that Hunter was up to no good." Which of course is entirely different from what Mr. Kent Actually said. So congratulations Comrade. You've earned a gold start for Deflection and Misrepresentation. And Comrade since you brought up that nice lady, Ambassador Yovanovitch, I couldn't help notice that you also did a good job once again of misrepresenting the Ambassador's Testimony. Since you have found the Ambassador's actual testimony you might want to take note of what she actually said, which was that she agreed with the questioner's statement that Hunter's role on the Burisma Board could create "the appearance of a conflict of interest." Not at all the same of course as you cleverly recast it, viz., "problems with Hunter on the ground." I like this! It's especially good, because you've avoided conveying what she actually said, which of course would not be helpful to our cause , comrade, and it's doubly good because it's sufficiently vague to leave your targets free to imagine the worst. I suppose a warning is appropriate about posting direct sources, as there is a danger that someone will take the time to watch a video or read an article in its entirety. This will invariably make your deflections and misrepresentation less effective. For example, you perhaps should not have posted either the excerpted Yovanovitch testimony or CNN article, as they under cut the effective of your misrepresentations. Next time , Comrade just cut out the parts that reinforce your deceptions and leave out the rest please. Be well, Comrade.