Ghost of If You Can Draw A Straight Line

Discussion in 'Journals' started by dbphoenix, Jan 1, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    At the time it showed strength, but that doesn't mean that one should not have taken the reversal when price rolled over, if he was trading at the time. Not trading simply because one anticipates a trend change to the upside is pretty silly. Let's see what happens here if price doesn't go anywhere before the NY open.
     
    #191     Jan 31, 2014
  2. niko

    niko

    Here is the update in today's, short not too promising, but still holding.

    [​IMG]
     
    #192     Jan 31, 2014
  3. Gringo

    Gringo

    I thought this short was nullified when NQ hourly gave a buy signal in the morning. I think I had brought this up in chat. I believe it's your TL that's causing you to stay in, when a tighter SL would have told you trend was changing and there was a retracement. I have only had a quick look at it but perhaps redrawing would clarify things a bit more.

    Notice the break in SL and then there's a Ret.

    [​IMG]

    Gringo
     
    #193     Jan 31, 2014
  4. guido

    guido

    this thread is really what it is all about trading .Nothing less nothing more.My compliment!
    However in my experience I would not use time charts to draw the various lines SL or DL .I find that the price is distorted especially when in a certain period of time there no activity.. or am I wrong?

    thanks

    have a nice weekend :)
     
    #194     Jan 31, 2014
  5. Damn, this is why I love the Wyckoff method. It's the only method I've ever seen that allows one to see what's most likely about to occur before it actually does...unlike typical technical analysis a.k.a pattern-watching.
     
    #195     Jan 31, 2014
  6. niko

    niko

    Given the fact that the short was in the money, I was looking for reasons to stay. Currently in my learning curve, the break of the line is not a reason to exit, at least not the whole thing. I have turned into a 50% kind of trader :).

    Nonetheless, the long was a hell of a good call. But wait, now is hindsight, so perhaps.....

    [​IMG]
     
    #196     Jan 31, 2014
  7. niko

    niko

    Now, I have to admit that I did not pay the due attention to the fact that Db mentioned earlier that the mean of the VST TC was being tested and therefore the short was at more risk than I initially assumed.

    Db is this the channel you were talking about?, don't we need a break above yesterday. Or is it that I am already seeing bunnies in the clouds?

    [​IMG]
     
    #197     Jan 31, 2014
  8. niko

    niko

    Interesting Guido, perhaps you could share your experience with the rest of the thread followers. There are hundreds of ways to skin a cat and yours could be a interesting one.

    Or not, your call :) .
     
    #198     Jan 31, 2014
  9. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Where we are:

    [​IMG]
     
    #199     Feb 1, 2014
  10. dbphoenix

    dbphoenix

    Some things have been shifted to chat since the people there are at least somewhat likely to be interested, whereas only a couple of people are interested in this thread, and due to the latter I'm not motivated to repeat it all here.

    In any case, the "hourly signal" was given on the 29th and had nothing to do with your trade unless you were trading the hourly. If the market were "fractal" it might, but since it isn't, it doesn't.

    Be that as it may, yes, you do have to make a higher high to confirm a trend change. Otherwise you end up with sideways chop.
     
    #200     Feb 1, 2014
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.