LOL..You had me thinking for a second,but there is no doubt,i am a discretionary trader who likes a systematic approack..Ask me again tomorrow,and maybe ill flip
I share the same experience....Ami can be a very simple charting tool with easy backtesting,optimisation amd money management.. If you feel like raisng the bar and tackling complex tasks,you better prepare yourself for a severly steep learning curve... Psytrade is 100% correct...If you are not a programmer,and dont want to make acareer of becoming one,get one of the non Ami programmers to write up code for a modest fee.Unless you enjoy pain
Comparative of performances, Tradestation, Wealth-Lab, Amibroker http://translate.google.com/transla...ndow=1&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=/language_tools
His comparison don't take many things like accuracy and features ...that available, into account Tradestation charges $250 platform fee and still has over 30,000 accounts, i don't buy that comparison in that shit link of yours ... common sense
Yes, the performances that he said is only the speed of running the back-testing of some simple trading system, and that system does not have the position sizing and portfolio management. TradeStation is more robust than WLD and AB. It's direct-access feature has more order types and their combination. But the portfolio management should use the add-on of RINA.