did you check the date of your article . Last time I checked, Trump was President. I am going to go out on a limb here and assume he still is.
I don't quite follow your thought sequence here. Perhaps you are thinking about sex and lost your focus a little. No prob. We understand. Otherwise, the post sequence was that I posted a picture of hillary being shown as Soros' puppet. Whereupon you advised me or others to not immediately buy into propaganda. So I posted a link showing that hillary was leading in campaign donations from billionaires AND THAT THE NUMBER ONE BILLIONAIRE CONTRIBUTOR WAS GEORGE SOROS WHO GAVE 12 MILLION TO HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN. You dont see the relationship between soros's donation and hillary being a puppet? That's fine. Others do. And I fail to understand how the fact that trump was elected and is president now, invalidates that information about Hillary and makes it untrue, or makes it all go away. If we are talking about Hillary, she is a soros puppet. Then, now, and in the future.
Just as here husband bill worked for Rubin and his banker buddies. The Hillary did not get to keep the Clinton machine together because of her husband charisma. It was the money.
I'm usually always thinking about sex. Actually I think that's illegal. But sticking to facts wouldn't make a very interesting story. But really who cares. It seems to have been money down the drain regardless, because I heard Trump won.
In regard to giving millions to support a candidate: It's complicated but it is definitely legal and is done bigly by those who know how to play the game. Individuals and regular pacs working with the candidates have limits and they are quite low. But you can give unlimied amounts to Super Pacs so-called. However that type of pac cannot coordinate activities and strategies or exchange funds with the candidates or their campaigns so you are not technically giving to them. But if you are a corporation and contribute 15 million to the "PUT HILLARY'S ARSE IN THE WHITEHOUSE IN 2017 SUPER PAC" you have a pretty good idea what it is supporting. That's the short version. And it gets into the whole Citizens United supreme court case, etc.
Of course this will happen. Why would it not? These open society groups are fighting totalitarian governments. Why would those governments welcome these groups. They wouldn't. Some of the things Soros has done have actually put him in personal danger, as for example when he flew into Sarajevo during the conflict their. He paid to have the water supply restored, undoubtedly saving many lives. He is a personal hero of mine, and I think everyone who cares about personal freedom should be very thankful that there are those like George Soros who have done incredibly unselfish things to help those less fortunate, and to fight totalitarian governments everywhere. https://www.rferl.org/a/balkans-without-borders-macedonia-soros-sarajevo-baez/27745323.html https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/helping-balkans-survive-decade-war http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1108599
I never heard that myself. She did win the popular vote if that's what you mean. But the popular vote is not how we elect presidents. We don't elect Presidents democratically, but I think all my friends know that.