I'm going to be watching the late night talk show hosts for the remainder of the week... They probably going to have some great one liners about Trump and the pending election loss. wrbtrader
Biden is President because Trump was hands down the most outwardly corrupt leader in US history and a buffoon, liar, cheat, and racist without a shred of empathy. Despite all of that, America was probably going to re-elect him. Then the coronavirus came and he decided to play it in quite possibly the dumbest way possible causing the US to enjoy wave after wave of it as the rest of the world mostly handled it responsibly. There is no one with Biden flags on their car. He's not the leader of a nationwide cult that believes in entirely and easily disprovable alternate realities. Their conspiracy theories aren't even fun because they're so obviously fake. But Biden does seem like a stable guy and Trump is a barking lunatic. An entirely new generation of people just want a President who doesn't tweet changes to major military policy to be made via tweets tweeted while the President is taking his morning dump with no thought to the consequences. Biden isn't Obama or Trump. He didn't start a movement. He didn't win so much as Trump lost. There's no conspiracy. This race was Trump's to lose and apparently he shot himself in the foot one or two hundred thousand times more than he should have.
If the numbers below are accurately reported, this is absolute proof of voter fraud and Biden is an illegitimate President. There is nothing else needing. This is the proof. Trump should absolutely fight as hard as he can. https://gnews.org/534248/ Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law However, in the Milwaukee County of Wisconsin, which is in one of the key swing states, Joe Biden’s votes violate Benford’s Law while other candidates’ don’t. (Joe Biden 69.4%, Donald Trump 29.4%, Jo Jorgensen 0.9%. Source: theguardian.com) So does that of Allegheny of Pennsylvania which includes Pittsburg. (Joe Biden 59.0%, Donald Trump 39.9%, Jo Jorgensen 1.2%. Source: theguardian.com) Here is a video of the charts above.
Well -- let's start with this. What do the digits at the bottom of this graph represent. Are they ballot sequence numbers or just something magical that the creator of the graphs magically invented.
Now you are inferring that the creator of the graph made up the numbers. That is not what I asked or what you stated previously. You are attempting to divert and change the subject. You stated that the people that push this nonsense don't understand Benford's Law. What do they not understand?
Anyone who pushes a graph like this without defining what the numbers mean on the X axis --- obviously does not have a clue about Benford's Law.
Are there datasets in which Benford's Law cannot be applied? Is it only applicable to ballot sequences?