Canadian company? If so, was US public money being used to fund Liberal political efforts in other countries? Did the money paid to this Canadian company fund Justin Trudeau’s rise to power and increasing Liberalism’s rise to prominence in Canada? Why was a US website designer not used? It certaintly wasn’t about saving money, was it? What is the initial cost of similar private sector national or global online websites? Pennies per user? Let the investigations begin on both sides of the border.
Huh? The rate of GDP growth was decelerating in Obama's last year. It went from 2.3% in Q2, to 1.9% in Q3 to 1.8% in Q4 of 2016.
Because something is a good idea, and we end up doing it, does not necessarily mean it is being done "to fund Liberal Political efforts in other countries." A problem for your way of thinking, I would guess, is that "liberal" Canada is a country on the rise, much as the U.S. was in the 1950s; yet you have plighted your troth, so to speak, with a would be, budding "White Nationalist Country". The U.S. is currently going down the dark road of nationalism and is clearly in decline in respect to its obedience to law and democratic principles. To recognize that something is seriously wrong, you will only need to look at the surprising number of people who recognize that our President is a criminal gangster, and yet are perfectly ok with this. My advice to you is to take your next summer vacation in "liberal" Canada. You won't want to leave! It represents everything you hold dear, but apparently can't fathom why.
Don't be swayed by these fake numbers. The reason Obama had low unemployment is because they counted those who applied for a job as employed, regardless if he/she got the job or fired later. Even with such a 'trick' by the Obama's administration, Trump's managed to overtake Obama's numbers.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/feb/10/donald-lambro-obama-hides-jobs-failure-by-not-coun/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterf...-be-fooled-the-obama-unemployment-rate-is-11/
Labor force participation rate is not counting those who applied for a job as employed and the same standard that applied to Obamas employment numbers applies to all presidents.