FXCM Is Buying RefcoFX - Deal is Done - Funds are safe

Discussion in 'Forex Brokers' started by Trader/God, Nov 11, 2005.

  1. def

    def Sponsor

    Just setting the record straight. He is not referring to an Introducing Broker which is often called an IB, he is referring to the firm called Interactive Brokers also referred to as IB. Jayford is correct to say that Interactive Brokers is very solid financially. IB (the firm) has ample excess capital and has a number of safeguards in place which the typical firm does not. Two that are unique are:

    1. Sweeping excess cash from the commodities account to the securities account. (this sweep brings cash under the protection of SIPC and the additional 3rd party insurance).

    2. strict margin and liquidation practices (avoids one client blowing out and bringing down the firm).

    Not all clients are happy about the second but those with large amounts of funds with us sleep better at night because of it.
     
    #211     Jun 28, 2006
  2. lite

    lite

    so what's the deal now?

    can refco fx clients get their money back or not? anyone else here with refco fx?
     
    #212     Jun 28, 2006
  3. Have you been living in a cave for the last 9 months?
     
    #213     Jun 28, 2006
  4. I didn't say AN IB. I said IB (Interactive Brokers).

    BTW, nothing wrong with using AN IB as long as they clear through a good firm. The introducing broker does not hold the funds.
     
    #214     Jun 28, 2006
  5. The title of this thread.....Well anyways the next time you are sure...go smoke a cigar first, that way you remove the risk of being close...



    close, but no cigar
    Archy
     
    #215     Jun 28, 2006
  6. Segregated means that your funds will not be used to cover a blow up by someone else. In case of bankruptcy though, its the secured debt holders that get first crack at all funds (I think). I am not sure how it works exactly, but I believe you get your funds back in full if another firm buys the accounts.

    In my case, the firm was FuturesWise. There was fraud involved as well as the firm's liquidation. I was lucky that I had a relatively small acct with them. Some guys had half million dollar accts and really got creamed.
     
    #216     Jun 28, 2006
  7. Yep..I got out just before the heartfelt letter....Did they guy go to prison? Sneedly, Snider Schneely or something like that... That was the day of the 5 buck RT...

    Did you know that everytime you went for 1 tick, you got filled from that bucketshop automatically...oh it was sweet...

    It doesn't hurt to have some friends in this industry...

     
    #217     Jun 28, 2006
  8. Thanks Jay, I need to get to the bottom of this answer. Until then I feel pretty confident with Dorman as they are older than dust itself.

    It has me thinking though because I was considering switching to Trans Act which I believe are self clearing.
     
    #218     Jun 28, 2006
  9. Snively. Perfect name for such activity. He got 5 years in prison starting last year.


     
    #219     Jun 28, 2006
  10. Transact clears through Goldy. They say they are self clearing sometimes, but when you press them on the issue they say Goldman Sachs. Maybe they clear both ways. I do know that much of their biz is experienced pros going for the volume discounts. I've heard mostly good things, except for a platform prob awhile back.

    Jay
     
    #220     Jun 28, 2006