Ok, I've said my piece, carry on. Just want to point out to ET this is a stretch, maybe not impossible, but very difficult to accept on face value. No hard feelings.
Could you please refrain from polluting this thread? Your "proof" is nothing of the kind and just does not belong here. Pls open your own thread to show off, threads like this are rare enough. Thanks.
You are right - I tried to delete those posts but was not able to. Perhaps the OP can? And one can not miss the fact that you have "Liked" all those replies with a hostile tone, encouraging a response from my side to say the least.
No I don't - I look for under the radar opportunities by reading SEC fillings only, looking for footnotes, etc...missed by the pros on stocks not well covered by the street. That's it - no secret sauce really.
Todays Results: Strategy 1: Open PL: +$968 Closed PL: +$136 Net: +$1,104 Strategy 2: Open PL: $0 Closed PL: $0 Net: $0 Closed PL Since Inception: +$6,810 MTM PL Since Inception: +$7,778 A lot less trades so far this week. Last week I had over 400 trades, only a few dozen so far this week. With most being pretty evenly split between bullish/bearish positions. This is by design, one of the primary factors I attributed to finally designing real world winning systems was starting every system in reverse - with "When not to trade". Identify all the reasons to NOT trade, once the lower probability setups were removed, I then focused on when to actually trade. This is opposite from the approach taken by most.
Actually, to give tonyf a little leeway, you have to admit it is possible. Notice how he scratches out the percentage gain? So if he gained 7 million over the past year, well, that was not hard to do...If you have money. See, that could be a 1% gain in his account over the year. So if you had 700 million in your account, and over the course of the year put 700 million into FAANGs and other incidental stocks, sure, you could gain 1%, or 7 million. It's not an outrageous claim.