Fully Automated Stocks Trading

Discussion in 'Journals' started by ValeryN, Jun 14, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. samuel11

    samuel11

    "Une hirondelle ne fait pas le printemps"
     
    #351     Feb 23, 2021
  2. Bigchazza

    Bigchazza

    Et une pandémie ne fait pas l'hiver.
     
    #352     Feb 23, 2021
  3. ValeryN

    ValeryN

    Feb was +14% month. Coincidentally, nearly identical to Feb last year but with less capital used and smaller positions, which is great.

    Some sort of fairy tale. All strategies made money. Timing couldn't have been better to withdraw for last year's taxes.

    Funny stats for this month:

    upload_2021-2-26_17-33-58.png

    Individual strategy + combined (% numbers are slightly off)

    upload_2021-2-26_17-34-27.png

    Val
     
    #353     Feb 26, 2021
    ktl8412, guru, mhparker and 1 other person like this.
  4. Bigchazza

    Bigchazza

    Hi Val. I'm struggling to interpret your performance chart above. I am certain it's because I don't know what it means, not because it's wrong! My problem is the combined performance in grey bars. Shouldn't it be an average of the individual strategies? E.g. for the first bar - shouldn't it be an avg of 2%, 0.5% and 0.01%? (figures not necessarily accurate - just going by the chart)
     
    #354     Mar 1, 2021
    shuraver likes this.
  5. ValeryN

    ValeryN

    No worries. Combined is a sum of all strategies.
    RealTest offers a nice table view to examine this in details.

    upload_2021-3-1_7-1-15.png

    Note that there will always be some discrepancy between this view and my live account. Source of diff is mainly
    1. Live vs model commissions
    2. Live positions carried over from previous month
    But normally it is negligible. When I post monthly PnL it's normally from a brokerage statement.

    Val
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2021
    #355     Mar 1, 2021
  6. Bigchazza

    Bigchazza

    Thanks Val. So each of those four blanked out columns above is a strategy? Here is the key question: are they each applied to the same capital simultaneously? E.g. you have a total pot of $1000 and you allocate $1000 to each strategy and let them compete for it? If so, the "Combined" column makes sense to me. If not, and each strategy is allocated e.g. 25% of total capital, it doesn't make sense! Sorry to pick - I find this really interesting.
     
    #356     Mar 1, 2021
  7. ValeryN

    ValeryN

    Yes and yes. One column is one strategy. Each has 100% allocation.
     
    #357     Mar 1, 2021
  8. mhparker

    mhparker

    I'm happy to see all those 0s in the discretion column :)
     
    #358     Mar 1, 2021
    HobbyTrading and ValeryN like this.
  9. Bigchazza

    Bigchazza

    I'm getting you now! BTW I took your recommendation and read the Laurens Bendorp book. He talks about being simultaneously 100% long and 100% short, and using leverage to do that. I found the book really helpful but TBH I am still shaky on that side - leverage and the mechanics of combining systems. Got a couple of things in the reading pile that will hopefully fix that.
     
    #359     Mar 1, 2021
    ValeryN likes this.
  10. ValeryN

    ValeryN

    Not sure if that is what he meant. Artificially maintaining same % invested in both sides will likely significantly reduce your potential returns and might expose you to unnecessary extra risk, unless they have same volatility and positive expectancy, which is unlikely at the same time. But test everything yourself and see what makes sense for you.
     
    #360     Mar 1, 2021
    d08, Bigchazza and mhparker like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.