Differential nonresponse bias rears it's head again. https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/11/6/13540646/poll-shifts-misleading-clinton-leads-trump
LOL. You say this while Trump has had coup plotting CIA Spyhunters up his ass and a do nothing TDS suffering group of House Dems who know nothing other than OrangeManBad. Imagine if he had a Congress who would work with him rather than try to frame him because they can’t get over losing an election.... imagine how they could get things done. Ask your ilk to come over to the winning side. You have to wake up though. And not your bullshit definition of Leftist ‘Woke’. You actually have to wake the fuck up.
Fucking loser, do you ever just fuck your wife and not this homo bullshit sucking Trump's mushroom cock? Try a woman, try a fucking banana skin as was posted about recently but stop with your homo nipple stroking freakshows.
If he had been doing a good job he might not have lost Congress by the most votes ever.The House is so gerrymandered Dems had very little chance of winning it but thanks to Trumps horrible job performance and racism they did. Trump had 2 years with a Congress who would work with him,all he did was give tax cuts for the rich and nearly double the deficit
Hahahahaha to your entire post. You are a true NPC. #OrangeManBad. That’s all your programming has told you.
We’ll see how sticky this number is. It is very possible he got a big, fast bump with the Senate trial but it’s also possible this is simply an outlier. Otherwise Trump is showing a much smaller bump in approval rating month over month. What’s important to understand is that any republican running for President can be elected with ~45% approval rating under the right circumstances due to the electoral college. If Trump is really at 49% on Election Day then democrats have no chance of winning the presidency.
in terms of Canada vs US, when you look at top 10 places to live in the world, Canada gets 2 (Vancouver and Toronto) but the US none! But before you move note Canadian housing costs are also high, unemployment is high, phone bills are highest in the world, Canadian health care system is dysfunctional, educational system has big flaws and it is no secret Canada has a drinking problem.
The deficit must never be paid off completely for a very good reasons. The debt is the sum total of deficits so long as debt is intentionally kept in balance with deficits.* Maintaining this balance gives the appearance of the government borrowing to spend amounts greater than its receipts. The amount of additional money left in the economy beyond government receipts is the deficit. The mechanism the government uses to add additional money into the economy is to create deficits. This can be done by some combination of increased government spending and tax reduction. Additional money is also temporarily created via the private sector lending-credit cycle. As productivity and population grows the government must furnish the economy with an every increasing amount of money to avoid deflation. Unless there is a long term decrease in population and/or productivity the government must run small deficits; thus an ever increasing aggregate deficit is a normal occurrence and part of good money management on the part of governments with growing populations and productivity. The only problem created by deficits occurs after deficits greatly exceed what is justified by population and productivity growth plus what is required for desired increases in savings which fuels credit and investment. The current deficit is unjustifiably high. Treasury-Central Bank operation can be used to temporarily sideline excess money in the economy. In an economy the size of the U.S.'s, there are huge lags. The ill effects of excessive deficits may not be seen until long after the administration responsible for these excesses is gone. Though it is tempting to think government money management is like personal money management, these two types of money management are two different animals. We must not think that the principles that guide our sound personal money management are the same for government. They are not. __________________ *Some countries have laws that require this, some do not. Technically the U.S. government does not have to borrow to spend in deficit, and in fact it regularly spends before it borrows. Although the government's issuance of Treasuries gives the appearance of the government borrowing to spend, the actual purpose of issuing bonds is somewhat different than it appears. These comments apply to a fiat money regime, but not necessarily to a commodity based regime.