In a world of bigots facts are animated by the bigots. There are no inanimate self-evident facts, only temporary agreements (alliances) in a war.
Who gives a shit about your respect? You called a black woman trans for no reason other than belittling her looks, you can GFY for all I care.
Well if I were to choose a client, you or Trump, I would base it on probabilities of getting paid, just as you base trades on the probability you are right about your analysis. With an over inflated sense of supremacy, I could be deceived, or deceive myself. I was once cheated by a self-described "evil developer" because I had not properly vetted him. In hindsight you could say I had some unreasonable feelings of supremacy.
You give a shit! You just gave a shit when you complained about it! Are you willing to abide by Moooolers ruling? Or, do you also not give a shit about Mooooooooler?
How many times have you degraded trans-folk by making the term out to be an insult? Meanwhile I haven't called the former first lady a trans once. I've said the probability is high, well beyond possibility. Calling her a trans, if I did, would not be an insult because there are several trans who look as good as many women, and better than some...which is why you don't know who is, or who isn't a woman, er, I mean a trans.
I made two statements and asked one question. To which statement do you refer? The question was: How many times have you degraded trans-folk by making the term out to be an insult?
Well if you don't give a shit about Moolers opinion, and I don't give a shit about Moolers opinion, then I think we have a temporary alliance establishing the fact that Mooler is a disgrace to the concept of justice.