If he has an unreasonable sense of supremacy, of any variety on the list above, he could be open to deception, as well as self-deception. On the other hand, if you have any unreasonable sense of supremacy yourself, you could easily be deceived about Donald J. Trump. Maybe that is what your media is counting on.
Who decides it's unreasonable if the facts are correct? When Donald J. Trump promised that he would release his tax returns after the audit and then he reneged on his promise, those are facts. Will these facts change because of my personal feeling that he is an indecent insufferable blowhard?
All I know is I discharge my debts paying 100cents in the dollar. If you did work for me or Trump I know who would be the one that would pay their invoice so you could feed yourself and your family. That alone gives me a sense of supremacy. I sleep sound and straight at night.
With a little inquiry into what you say you know, we could find out if you fit the profile of a bigot who is suffering from an over-inflated sense of supremacy and it's consequent symptoms of self-deception.
I've traded the markets for about twenty years. There's little room, I didn't say no room for self-deception or over inflated sense of supremacy. I'm only human. Part of the reason I prefer to pay my debts in full. A sense of compunction.
In a world of bigots, force decides what the facts are. Deception is the first stage of force, beginning with self-deception. Deception is covert force. When deception fails, overt force is used if the bigots can afford the higher cost (deception is generally more cost efficient). One way to deceive is to repeat non-facts over and over, to oneself, and/or to others. One way to repeat non-facts over and over is to flood the battlefield with bigoted statements (if bigotry was like bullets). As the unreasonable sense of supremacy is reduced, there is more peace in the world, beginning with self-information, resulting in a more balanced self-esteem. If a bigot gets his facts straight, just remember, a broken clock is right twice a day.
No it doesn't, you are talking of history - not facts that have evidence of their own. Like saying Mueller has 13 Democrats on board when in fact most don't have a history with Dems while few of them donated to Republicans? Deception like that? Like calling Mueller Mooler? Like claiming Michelle Obama is trans with nothing to back up the claim, telling people to 'google it' as if that determines facts How many times have you said Michelle Obama is a trans
I said "in a world of bigots". Bigots are bigger than the facts. In such a world, facts are not self-evident. In a world of bigots there are no facts, only alliances in a war.
Are you saying you are willing to abide by Moooler's rulings? I say Mooooler because a prosecutor using a dual standard doesn't deserve my respect. Besides that, Mooooler hasn't done anything to deserve my respect.