Fox News: A 24/7 Political Operation

Discussion in 'Politics' started by kut2k2, Oct 21, 2009.

  1. It seemed like a stupid idea to go after a news outlet - whether or not you consider them "news" is irrelevant.

    But then I thought - what if there are people in the admin who have collected dirt on the people in that news org - like, what if they've had a mic so far up Rove's ass even his proctologist can't find it?

    And what if they used...the power that the Bush Admin gave the gov't to collect that info? Remember the Dept. of Homeland Sec saying something about "extreme" conservatives could be a threat?

    So maybe they have something - and maybe they got it using the power the Bush Admin gave them - otherwise, why go after a news org?
     
    #21     Oct 21, 2009

  2. Mutants anger is misdirected. It should be directed at the Goldman Sachs of the world, they're the ones who've successfully subverted government, along with Rubin, Summers, Greenspan.
    See the Frontline piece with Brooksley Born who tried to warn of the meltdown and the need for regulation and was ignored by
    the titans of finance.
     
    #22     Oct 21, 2009
  3. The point was the hatred, contempt and bias the "reporter" had for the crowd.

    Its amazing how blind liberals are. I think Savage is right. It is a mental disorder.
     
    #23     Oct 21, 2009
  4. Mnphats

    Mnphats



    Sadly, I have no doubt you actually believe this.
     
    #24     Oct 21, 2009
  5. I agree the mental disorder amongst those teabaggers is just too hard to even watch. Lincoln? How about Fred Flintstone?
     
    #25     Oct 21, 2009
  6. I don't expect an honest response from the right, but if there were a lie detector, I wager the moment there is some news event of a political nature, the Fox sheeple immediately think:

    "I wonder what Rush thinks about this..."

    The right wing has always been into conformity and authoritarianism...

    Fox News fits their model perfectly...

     
    #26     Oct 21, 2009
  7. Thats what happens. They get their daily post hypnotic suggestion reinforcement meant to invoke the word socialist
    or unconstitutional ...mutants -- its SO ...apt.
     
    #27     Oct 21, 2009

  8. Do you have some proof for that? I don't even listen to Rush, but agree with some of his stands. I suspect he is just echoing what some already espouse, such as myself.

    He is a broadcaster and nothing more. And considering him the sole voice for conservatives is laughable. Optional, you sound like a fairly level-headed liberal, although at times you have some really screwy ideas.

    :D
     
    #28     Oct 21, 2009
  9. Another Fox News viewer too stupid to understand the euphemism...

     
    #29     Oct 21, 2009
  10. kut2k2

    kut2k2

    cuntload45 = typical reichtard that doesn't know the diff between informed dissent and talking out of his ass.

    Fox News = Faux News = Faked News

    The evidence is irrefutable, and simply saying you don't agree with the evidence is not a refutation, it's just an admission that you're a childish nitwit who can't accept reality.
     
    #30     Oct 21, 2009