Complete bullshit. You clearly have a reading comprehension problem. The Fox article you posted says that the text raise questions. Show me where it states that the text are about the Clinton probe. IT DOES NOT STATE THAT.
Provide a source for this, I am not going to let you lie and then accept your ridiculous conclusion Steele went to the FBI with the Dossier on SEPTEMBER 14th The texts are from Sep 2nd. Can you do basic math? What has Obama texts got to do with the dossier?
Absolute horseshit "The newly uncovered texts reveal a bit more about the timing of the discovery of "hundreds of thousands" of emails on former Congressman Anthony Weiner's laptop, ultimately leading to Comey's infamous letter to Congress just days before the 2016 presidential election." Where is the question there? Show me the fucking question.
Campaign research? Is that what you call what the FBI was doing to Trump at the time L. Page texted, "potus wants to know everything we are doing?" Was that a Freudian Slip? Finding things out, and making things up are two different things. Running into court and lying about made-up "campaign research" to get a warrant to spy is political. So yes, the FBI was engaged in a political campaign, against an opponent. Even more so if it's true that "potus wants to know everything we are doing".
https://www.mediaite.com/online/oba...-news-reportedly-was-not-about-clinton-probe/ That came shortly after Kimberly Guilfoyle reiterated the same point about how it raises questions about what Obama knew in the Clinton investigation and when:
Steele was doing the campaign research, he found criminality and went to the FBI - that's what you are supposed to do. FBI is supposed to investigate criminality, when they opened an investigation into Clinton Foundation based on a book by Breitbart's editor, did you cry foul? You keep saying 'lying'. What was the lie about Page in the dossier? Be specific. And why didn't you quote rest of my post but you keep lying about the POTUS quote. Didn't I explain to you that the dossier was given to the FBI AFTER those texts in question and BEFORE Carter Page's October warrant? Do you not understand that September 2nd comes BEFORE September 14 and October 26?
And? Did you miss the second para? What's with your selective reading? From that article Fox News’ report this morning noted, “According to a newly released Senate report, this text raises questions about Obama’s personal involvement in the Clinton email investigation.” I quoted you parts of that article where they were not just asking questions. Do I have to do it again?
You reminded me of this Fox has figured out that by simply putting a question mark at the end of something, you can say f**king anything. http://www.cc.com/video-clips/8ov5kh/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-the-question-mark Congratulations on being brainwashed.
You know when somethings really hitting home when the DNC Ministry of Truth's Propaganda Team goes into full meltdown on these boards. Fun to watch them sweat.
So let me get this straight, Fox News - your favorite source of right wing propaganda publishes FAKE NEWS, gets called out by their sister right wing newspaper WSJ. A non-conservative then posts it on this board who gets attacked by deranged Cons who are upset that their news conspiracy theory collapsed. They can't even argue logically about any of the contents and run away when asked pointed questions. But it's the person who posts this info that's the propagandist. Not a word on Fox News itself that pushed this propaganda. Everyone else is at fault. In fact you don't care about the facts, it's about how 'someone is melting down' pointing out the numerous lies that were peddled. Conservatism is a disease of the low intellect morons, thanks for proving that again and again. PS: Thanks for the personal attack, that's what keeps me going.