You seem to be not very well versed in this concept about dates and calendars. Strzok messaged about Weiner's laptop on September 28 and a few days later, they found metadata about backup of Clinton's emails. There was no reference to Clinton emails until then - Sep 28 in the latest. The message about 'Obama wanting to know everything' was on September 2. Please don't waste my time with absolute crap just because you cannot do basic logical deductions.
No, you started to cover other scenarios, AFTER you concluded that i said C. Page was part of Trump's campaign. I'm aware of C. Page's apparent comings and goings on the fringes of Trump's campaign, and that he was "gone" (if ever he was really part of the campaign) after he became the subject of a smear campaign, probably headed by the FBI who was USING him to get at Trump. So i'm not low information like the people here you are trying to dupe with the talking points you are shoving down their throats. But you said i lied about Carter Page, no ifs, ands, or butts. So i called you out. Now this is another subject. I understand you want to change the subject from the lie you told about me lying about Carter Page. As i've said, the Trump dossier was in FULL PLAY when L. Page made her famous comment: "potus wants to know everything we are doing". Well, what they were doing, at that time, was spying on Trump, having boosted a FISA application with a bogus "dossier". C. Page was incidental by this time, having never been enough to get a FISA warrant on it's own merit.
They are quoting WSJ, if you have a WSJ subscription, you can read it right here. Its behind a paywall https://www.wsj.com/articles/texts-...preparing-obama-briefing-on-russia-1518036629
Did Obama just on 9.2.16 want to know everything they are doing? Did he want to know everything previously? Was this normal for Obama to want to know everything? What are they specifically talking about in the text. We don't know. You don't know.
If I concluded that then why would I use IF? Do you use IF-THEN scenarios when you have concluded something? It's a simple question. Another simple question. If the FBI was trying to get Trump, why wouldn't they damage his campaign by announcing that they caught one of their guys in Australia who pleaded guilty and another one is working for the Kremlin? Why hide these facts if they wanted to get him? Or you mean they wanted to get him doing something illegal? What's wrong with that exactly? They were not pushing him into doing something illegal, just watching them while they do so voluntarily. Somebody who lectures others on talking points is now using the same talking points as his messiah instructed them to use What is 'bogus' about the dossier? When did they 'spy' on Trump? Where is the evidence? You keep lying and lying and lying I keep asking you to provide a SINGLE piece of evidence to show that FBI spied on Trump or even his campaign. You can't provide a single one. Why is that?
Oh, okay. So next time I find a Breitbart article that has a quote from WSJ in it, the Breitbart article is all factual. Or, if Breitbart quotes a liberal rag like NYT, everything in the Breitbart article is absolutely true. The quote makes it true.
I know it was not related to Hillary's email investigation, you asking irrelevant questions trying to pretend that your fake Fox News story has credibility is your desperation talking.