Neither quoted you or named you but you took it personal, speaks volumes. Glad you took the opportunity to rehash your fake talking points. If you want to talk about diseases, the liberal/progressive movement has been the biggest domestic threat to this Nation. Go crawl back under your rock shill.
I know how your little Con brain operates, 'triggering' others, claiming victory when there is none, claiming that getting a reaction out of someone is victory even when the debate is lost. You are not fooling me, I have interacted with brain dead morons like you since I got interested in politics, I am well aware of every single little trick you guys use. And I don't need lectures from a Trump supporter on 'fake' talking points, your fake Obama talking points got destroyed. California, the most progressive/liberal state in the country is posting record surpluses while being the biggest economy in the country while your red state shit holes mooch off them while nominating pedophiles to the Senate. Without these liberal states, you would be working for Mexican drug cartels to feed your trailer trash brethern. Go back to your inbred shithole con for seconds with your sister wife, go lick a reality TV star's boots because he pretends to hate the elites.
Poor little snowflake got their panties in a wad. Hey, question for ya. What was the name of Roy Rogers' horse?
to summarize the dnc troll not only took my second quote out of context. and ignorantly misstated that I called it watergate when it was really the text from page now we see he even misrepresented in his title to this thread what fox actually reported. I only wonder if he overstated his dnc talking points or if his talking points were lies to begin with. Finally, I remind you we don't really know whether Obama wanted to be briefed on the Clinton emails or the russian dossier misdirection or russian hacking or everything. What we got was the WSJ citing what some fbi people think. People who most likely really don't know. If the cabal at the top were talking to the WSJ that would really be a story.
Here's a good headline for him to spin.... "Uranium One informant says Moscow paid millions in bid to influence Clinton" http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...aid-millions-in-bid-to-influence-clinton.html