Found that dude trading CL with an IB account

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by DarthSidious, May 8, 2020.

  1. KISS

    KISS

    in the 'real world' , prices don't drop 99% and then the next day goes 1000%. the bros in the exchange changed the 'rules' cause the old rules' restricted their ability to make easy money. via market manipulation. okay the exchange used to have rules regarding price limits during regular trading hours and after hours, there used to be no afterhours trading either as it was too illiquid and ripe for market manipulation. they had rules but somehow they decided to remove the rules What used to be prohibited and frowned upon or considered illegal market activities like market manipulation market behavior is now encouraged and is now considered fair and normal market activity.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2020
    #101     May 9, 2020
  2. Knew this was ib's fault day 1

    Programming black swan

    Good of them to fess up to the obvious
     
    #102     May 10, 2020
  3. PS, margin is per contract , not based on the price.

    IB screwed that up too ? They coded max margin based on a zero bound ?

    I said weeks ago, folks there needed to get the axe.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2020
    #103     May 10, 2020
  4. Funny, I was watching the days trade on ThinkOrSwim, which showed the neg prices perfectly .

    I use IB too, but never looked at their prices, so didn't realize they were screwy. Did notice the charts were borked.
     
    #104     May 10, 2020
  5. I used to lend $$$$ to ib when they paid 5-6 and even 7% on short term paper (15 years ago )

    I pulled the funds during the fin crisis, thinking they might go bust during all the mayhem, but of course they did not.

    Rather safe than sorry.
     
    #105     May 10, 2020
  6. You've gone off on a tangent here. The issue is not with the margin requirements, it would have been more than adequate if IB's system was working properly, it wouldn't have allowed Shah to trade 212 cars at $30 margin each when exchange margin was a few hundred times that.

    This could all have been avoided if IB had kept up with what was going on and updated their antiquated systems properly, but instead of doing the right thing, they went all out to cripple their other clients with ridiculous margin hikes e.g 3X exchange margin on ES. I'm up huge YTD but I reckon I would up at least 50% more if it wasn't for IB's ridiculous margin policies.

    It gives me pleasure to know that IB lost 100m due to their incompetence, yes its schadenfreude but they deserve it, truly.
     
    #106     May 10, 2020
    cruisecontrol likes this.
  7. IB should count themselves lucky, this thing could have bankrupted them easily.
     
    #107     May 10, 2020
    cruisecontrol and NotKenGriffin like this.
  8. Tps

    Tps

    Agree...
    A 10MM account could have bought 330k contracts, resulting in a loss of >12 Billion.
    With CL dropping without a bottom he would def have gotten filled at 0.01 on quite some size.

    Taking IBKR off the map.
     
    #108     May 10, 2020
  9. Alexpung

    Alexpung

    There is a position limit at the exchange level, for WTI Houston Crude Oil Futures the limit is 10k contracts, for a single month, and 20k for all months, so I don't think it is possible to buy that many.
     
    #109     May 10, 2020
    TraDaToR likes this.
  10. Tps

    Tps

    Ok, didn't know that. But they could still easily have gone out of business over this. For e.g. if oil (CL) went negative earlier than 15 min before expiration and IB customers loaded up on WTI not realizing it can go <0 due to the low margin req.
     
    Last edited: May 10, 2020
    #110     May 10, 2020