True. As you can't calculate Kelly Criterion without having everything else defined, laid down, first. Position sizing is relative to the system's performance. One has first to define the system, run it (Backtest or else) then analyze the outcomes to tell if, and how much, one has to bet. Risk management is about the optimization risk and reward. Max the system expectancy (If any Asvantage) while keeping risk of ruin flat.
Money management is the last, not the first thing (as many claim) in trading. ___________________________________________________________________ Money management is the last thing in trading for those that blow up or are on the road to ruin. And true, most traders neglect this until they blow up a few accounts and finally realize how important it is. Adjusting your risk based on a chart pattern is your choice, the position would have to be scaled way down. This is a common approach of a novice trader. Pros buy the break out from big chart patterns, keeping the risk at or under 1% most of the time. "If I have positions going against me, I get right out; if they are going for me, I keep them… Risk control is the most important thing in trading. If you have a losing position that is making you uncomfortable, the solution is very simple: Get out, because you can always get back in.” Paul Tudor Jones (floor runner that traded his way up to to a billionaire)
a shorter timeframe principles can be extrapolated to larger timeframes, using the same risk management.
Here's a 1% risk limiter, with a trend filter, tested on a batch of commodities. Earn interest on capital is set to zero.
Making some perfect equity curve from back testing is like dunking on a 4' high kids size basketball hoop. So you have a computer adding every 'what if' from the advantage of hindsight to give you what you want to see.
it just a 200 day exponential moving average system, there is no curve fitting involved. What the tests show is periods of consolidation and breakout on a global batch of commodities over decades. Playing those 'breakouts' would lead to overall profit if risk is limited to 1% on each attempt. If you implement system during one of those 'consolidative periods', you would be forced to turnoff the system secondary to drawdowns.
Gotcha - Yea in a raging bull market if you follow the longer trend it is pretty darn linear. My bad.