Former US State Governor Questions 9/11 Official Story

Discussion in 'Politics' started by 5Pillars, Apr 3, 2008.

  1. no... dumbass... the penthouse falls because of the interior structure being blown up first. this allows the bldg to fall in its own footprint. DUHHHHHHHHHHH

    look at any implosion... most are similar. seriously.. are you stupid? this is basic common sense.. to think you can't figure this out tells me you shouldnt be trading.

    the timing of the explosions is done like this intentionally.. so the counting must start when the actual structure begins falling.. i.e. the 4 corners. there are no ifs, ands, or buts about this. it is freefall speed.. to say other wise is lying. is your last name clinton? you dodging sniper fire? LOL
     
    #31     Apr 6, 2008
  2. maybe the stupidest post ever on ET! immediate ignore.
     
    #32     Apr 6, 2008
  3. 1000

    1000

    what is even more disturbing

    is the disrespect that is shown by the conspiracy theorists to the victims of 9/11, and all those directly affected by this Evil deed purpetrated by the Muslim Radicals.

    No one ever takes time to give respect to those who have died and suffered as a result of the attacks.

    This just shows how baseless and screwed up those conspiracy assholes really are. They are the shit of human society and mankind.

    and most of all it is the troops who have since given up their lives or who's lives have been changed for ever, so as to ensure our freedom, and that that 9/11 thing never happens again.
     
    #33     Apr 6, 2008
  4. 1000

    1000

    This is Structural Engineering.

    Your insults are directed to a Institution and R&D which is based on real experiments and facts and taught in all Schools of Engineering.

    This just proves the kind of baseless idiot that you are.
     
    #34     Apr 6, 2008

  5. most of the families now believe the govt is lying and they want a new investigation. sorry your little hate speech aint flying.
     
    #35     Apr 6, 2008
  6. go sell your comic book explanations to haroki and turok. you havent begun to explain anything.
     
    #36     Apr 6, 2008
  7. 1000

    1000

    This is Structural Engineering, as I said before.

    This is real science based on the Charpy Impact Test for the brittleness of materials.

    The Creep of Metals is based of experience from lead drainage pipes.

    This stuff is actual science of the stress and strain of materials. It is the bases of metal and concrete structures.

    I am not selling any explanations, this is real facts in Engineering Science Books, you idiot.
     
    #37     Apr 6, 2008
  8. DrEvil

    DrEvil

    Ratboy, I admire your persistence. I once got onto a discussion about building 7 on ET and to be honest it got so boring, it degraded into insults going back and forward and even one poster resorting to faking my posts (which btw they admitted to later in the post). Rest assured that there are a lot of people here who understand that wtc7 argument rests on the simultaneous and symetrical lack of resistance throughout the entire structure required for the building to fall at such speed unobstructed. One instant the support and structure of the building is there and then other instant it has vanished.

    You are probably wasting your time. I'm not even sure that I would want the truth to come out officially, the consequences might be worse than than the status quo.
     
    #38     Apr 6, 2008
  9. 1000

    1000

    There is no hate speech. I know what those Muslim "dickhead" radicals are like. Just thank you lucky stars that you never came or will come across one of them. And it is possibly thanks to the troops you protect your freedom, if you know what that means.

    The reason why people think that government is lying, is because the government doesn't have a scientific explanation of why the towers failed. After all they are politicians, not scientists, and neither are the people.
     
    #39     Apr 6, 2008
  10. 1000

    1000

    Thanks to the intelligence of the people, who didn't listen to these kind of suggestions at the time of Sir Isaac Newton.

    There are suggestions that Sir Isaac Newton was ridiculed in the same way when giving his lecture to a bunch of degenerates under an apple tree, when he developed the theory of gravity, after an apple fell on his head.

    I suspect the average dumb ass American is no different. It's just that 300 years later, no one is suggesting that gravity doesn't exist.

    May be you want me to prove gravity!
     
    #40     Apr 6, 2008