I said hypothetically, and then posed 2 questions which challenged it. I don’t think AI will have that impact too, underscored by the inefficiencies seen in companies already
It is ironic though that if you look at Niederhoffer's twitter he is an alcoholic that does nothing but tweet total nonsense these days. Some days he is so drunk he can't even spell right. That doesn't mean Education of Speculator isn't still a great book.
New history about to be written @ EOM. Big Reshuffle of $71 Billion ETF Looms as Nvidia Surpasses Apple Lu Wang and Isabelle Lee Updated Mon, Jun 17, 2024, 3:37 PM EDT4 min read 173 In This Article: NVDA+1.85% AAPL-0.65% ^GSPC+0.06% (Bloomberg) — One of the world’s most prominent technology ETFs looks poised for a big rebalancing that would ramp up exposure to Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) at the expense of Apple Inc. (AAPL) – spurring billions of dollars in trading volume in one fell swoop. Barring an 11th-hour deviation from the methodology set out by index provider S&P Dow Jones Indices, State Street Global Advisors is on track to revamp the composition of its $71 billion Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) after Nvidia’s market value closed above Apple on Friday. The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) View quote details NYSEArca - Nasdaq Real Time Price (USD) 231.30 +0.18(+0.08%) As of 10:53AM EDT.Market open. Full screen For months, XLK has held way fewer Nvidia shares even as the AI giant soared 166% year-to-date. When the chipmaker ranked in third place, it made up roughly 6% of the ETF’s assets, compared with 22% in the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. The ownership cap, imposed under diversification rules, has caused XLK to underperform massively this year. While S&P in theory reserves the right to make an exception, industry participants say the ETF is on track to be re-tooled when it enacts the quarterly rebalance near the end of June. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) View quote details NasdaqGS - Nasdaq Real Time Price (USD) 133.35 +2.37(+1.81%) As of 10:54AM EDT.Market open. Full screen NVDAAAPL On that basis, Apple and Nvidia are set to reverse their positions in the ETF with the former’s weight dropping to 4.5% and the latter rising above 20%, according to calculations sent by the index provider to three market participants familiar with the matter. State Street stands to purchase $11 billion of Nvidia shares and dump $12 billion of Apple, one estimate shows. That’s not insignificant — the forecast sale in Apple shares is equal to the average daily trading value in the past three months. “By our calculation, the flip-flop between Nvidia and Apple will occur,” said Chris Harvey, head of equity strategy at Wells Fargo Securities. “This aligns the XLK ETF more closely with the momentum trade and semis. At the margin, it’s more dollars chasing a stock that does not need any additional help.” A spokesperson for S&P declined to comment on potential index changes and referred Bloomberg News to the methodology. Matt Bartolini, head of SPDR Americas Research at State Street, said XLK will rebalance according to its rules and the methodology. The ETF is obliged to track the S&P benchmark that is designed to stay in compliance with the diversification regulations. The rules “have served investors well,” he said. S&P has left the door open to making an exception when it unveils sector weightings at the end of the month, judging by a document sent late last week and seen by Bloomberg News. The index committee “reserves the right to make exceptions when applying the methodology if the need arises,” S&P wrote in a note regarding the June rebalance. “In any scenario where the treatment differs from the general rules stated in this document or supplemental documents, clients will receive notice, whenever possible.” S&P said it will send clients so-called proforma documents related to the rebalance for sector indexes each day through Friday. Any last-minute deviation from the public methodology would not be taken well by traders, who tend to take positions in anticipation of possible revisions in index rebalances like this. While it’s getting crowded, buying stocks that are entering major indexes and selling those that are exiting them has become one of the most reliable strategies for the hedge fund world. Underpinning the massive adjustments in the duo’s weightings in the ETF are diversification rules dating back more than 80 years that were established to safeguard investors from concentrated bets. Under those rules, the combined representation of the largest companies — those making up roughly 5% or more of a diversified fund — can’t add up to more than 50%. Similar restrictions last year spurred the overseer of the Nasdaq 100 to conduct a special rebalance to keep index-tracking funds in compliance with the rules. When this rule is breached, indexes such as the Nasdaq 100 tend to trim the top holdings proportionally. XLK’s methodology works differently. When a number of stocks are not in compliance, the smallest of those gets clipped. This unique rule is why Nvidia has been massively under-owned by XLK, leading the fund to trail the traditional S&P 500 tech sub-index by more than 5 percentage points this quarter — the widest dispersion since 2001. With the semiconductor pioneer catching up to Apple and Microsoft Corp. in size during recent weeks, XLK’s upcoming rebalances have garnered Wall Street interest given the prospect of volatility-inducing weight additions and reductions to some of the world’s most closely watched tech companies. “I am interested to see if they keep the rules the same through the next rebalance in September,” said James Seyffart, ETF analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “If Apple manages to surpass Nvidia or Microsoft by the next rebalance reference date — which is September 13th — we could have a mirror image massive rebalance where Apple is bought to the tune of billions and Nvidia or Apple are sold to the tune of billions.”
This is a big reason why I like value funds. Buying an established, huge company at a PE of 70+ is stupid. A good fund should do the opposite of what this is doing. Buy low sell high. The whole idea that because the price went up you should buy more is dumb. The earnings must justify the price.
Good point. There is going have to be a return on all these investments. If it doesn't happen it will indeed collapse. My guess is that it will be like the build out of fiber in the late 1990s. Everyone knew it was the future but it was too far in the future to use at the time. I worked at a start up in the late 1990s and we had OC3 from our local telecom in Oakland, CA and we were getting 45 Mbits symmetrical. It was like $500/month. It was worth it for us since we had web crawlers downloading content from the web that we cataloged in our PostGRES & MySQL databases.
(SEMAFOR) Nvidia is world’s most valuable company Nvidia surpassed Microsoft to become the most valuable company in the world Tuesday as its market cap hit $3.33 trillion. The US-based chipmaker commands about 80% of the market for high-powered artificial intelligence chips, and the stratospheric climb in its share price has encapsulated the investor frenzy around the AI boom. “It’s Nvidia’s market; we’re all just trading in it,” a market strategist at a global brokerage firm said. Another analyst called Nvidia’s chips “the new gold or oil in the tech sector.” Its global investments, especially in Southeast Asia, have been a big part of Nvidia’s success. The company has made major inroads in Singapore, Vietnam, and Malaysia, which are considered more immune to geopolitical fallout from US-China tensions.