And this relates to Ivermectin, how? Well I guess it is only the dumb Ivermectin cultists who post this type of stuff -- without any context of the big picture of medical staffing.
There you go guessing again. Are you pretty clueless without some authority figure to follow? Zinc inside cells reduces viral replication. Chaperone compounds enable increased uptake of Zinc into cells. Given the less than 'mission accomplished' nature of the jabs, ...
Pushing more misinformation, eh. The 86% figure relates to pain at the injection site. What a surprise when you get a shot you have mild pain where you were injected. Shocking But as usual you pushing more bullshiat without proper context. Figures about Pfizer side effects for children need more context https://fullfact.org/health/86-per-cent-children-adverse-reaction-pfizer/ A post on Instagram claims that 86% of children suffered an adverse reaction to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine in clinical trials. Specifically, it says that 86% suffered an adverse reaction after the first dose, with 78.9% suffering an adverse reaction after the second dose. These figures are correct, but are missing vital context. The image in the post itself provides a link to a fact sheet, written by the US Food and Drug Administration, for health care providers administering the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. This document clearly states that the two figures, 86% and 78.9%, relate to pain at the injection site, for example a sore arm in the days after vaccination. The vast majority of these events were described as causing only mild or moderate pain, and were reported during a study involving participants aged between 12 and 15 years old. Dervila Keane, global media relations spokesperson for Pfizer Europe, told Reuters that the safety of the vaccine was similar to other vaccines given to adolescents, with mostly short-term, moderate or mild side effects such as a sore arm at the site of vaccination. In June, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced that the UK approval of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine had been extended, meaning it could be given to 12-15 year-olds. Several other countries, including the US, Canada and Israel have already given universal approval for 12 to 15 year-olds to have the vaccine. A spokesperson for the MHRA told Reuters in July: “In the clinical trial, the safety data in children 12-15 years of age was comparable with that seen in young adults 16-25 years of age and no new side effects were identified.” We have written before about the possible link between the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and myocarditis (heart inflammation) or pericarditis (inflammation of the lining around the heart) in younger men. The MHRA said in early July that it had conducted a thorough review of reports of myocarditis after vaccination, adding that reports typically presented as mild cases with individuals recovering within a short time following standard treatment and rest. Healthcare professionals and people getting the vaccine were also advised to be aware of the signs and symptoms of the condition.
Right-wing legislator wants to force doctors to prescribe Ivermectin for Covid and for pharmacies to be forced to fill the prescription. Even though Ivermectin is useless for preventing and treating Covid. Furthermore the bill wants medical people not to be punished for malpractice when prescribing useless remedies. This opens the door for complete quackery with no standards. This is idiocy in America. ‘Dangerous precedent.’ Ivermectin could be used as COVID treatment in Indiana bill https://www.kansascity.com/news/coronavirus/article257562193.html A proposed Indiana bill would allow for ivermectin to be used as a treatment against COVID-19, and health officials warn that if it passes, the consequences could be far-reaching, news outlets report. House Bill 1372, authored by Republican state Rep. Curt Nisly, would permit doctors and nurses to “create a standing order” for ivermectin, and pharmacists would be required to dispense the drug, no prescription necessary. The bill would also prohibit the state boards for each profession from taking disciplinary action against any of the medical practitioners involved. Health care providers who have given ivermectin to patients for COVID-19 have faced consequences for doing so, McClatchy News reported. (More at above url)