so you are 100% sure that sometime in the history of the earth it never rotated much slower than it did today ?
No, that was not my point. You're setting up a straw man. I said that the Genesis creation accounts were in error scientifically, since all of life did not appear within six days. Even if a day meant 10 million years, it still did not happen. The Genesis creation accounts are to seen as poetry, not as science. And, yes, I am 100% sure of that!
well, I'm not sorry volente that is sick it is what it is and what it is not, is science.... The passage you quote is taken from a religious apologistâs blog on Yahoo , sub titled "This is a paper I wrote for English102". What was it you said about... "scientific studies showing the correlation" Both the Oedipus and Electra complex (feminine Oedipus attitude, aka 'Daddy Issues'...yes it would be funny if it weren't so sad ) are the contentious works of Sigmund Freud and refer both to male and female children only. If Freudian Oedipus psychoanalysis is correct, that guy whoever he is (not you is it?) would surely be exhibiting signs of a phobia in hating men for not loving his imaginary God. Your quote is written by someone who , by what they themselves suggest , is possibly having pathological issues of their own. Trying to extract parts of a highly controversial and unproven work known to be questionable to then present them as science in support of delusions towards an invisible sky daddy the way you do , says more about a Freudian psychological disorder than most anything else. "Freud views the idea of God as being a version of the father image, and religious belief as at bottom infantile and neurotic. Authoritarian religion is dysfunctional and alienates man from himself." wikipedia What Freudian psychosis is it that has some theists so desperate , they will mislead , mis-inform or just plain lie about stuff in hope of satisfying their need to convince others of their delusory pretence . Why not christen it, the Freud Faith Complex. or just sick for short
God is nature. So those that are praying for rain are really praying to nature to get back on cycle. Is nature supernatural now ? I'm sure in your mind it is. Wipe those frowns off your face my atheist friends. It's a beautiful day and a higher power loves you.
VOO: >God is nature. So those that are praying for >rain are really praying to nature to get back on cycle. Of course they are praying for nature to get back on cycle. Problem is (for your argument), is that they have lost faith that nature will do that on it's own and are now praying for supernatural action to make it happen. If it's gonna happen on it's own, no need for the request. >Is nature supernatural now ? I'm sure in your mind it is. You're sure and wrong. Nothing supernatural about nature ... now *overriding* nature and making it rain upon request is of course the very definition of supernatural. Serious religious people pray to win the lottery -- how are you going to attempt to explain that one away as "really praying for nature to get back on track? LOL JB
Whoa. Whoa. Whoa. Everyone knows that JI Joe, the Tooth Fairy and Unicorns don't exist. But Batman? Are you suggesting or implying that Batman doesn't exist? There are books about Batman. He has a history that is well documented in the archives of DC Comics. There are videos, for pete's sake! I once sat in the Batmobile at a car show in Montreal in the late 60s. If there is no Batman, then why would there be a Batmobile? It just doesn't add up. Don't you want Batman to fight crime? Where is your scientific proof that Batman doesn't exist? (You're so naive.)
...there's a clue in your question to its answer . Can you spot it...? No? oh dear. Nature is not super-natural. It's â¦.well... â¦natural.