For my Christians Friends

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nyxtrader, Mar 23, 2008.

  1. stu

    stu

    well ook, but it wud have to be very very blind
    :cool:
     
    #871     Apr 29, 2008
  2. volente_00

    volente_00



    Some on here are so closed minded that they believe different from your viewpoint. I have never included you in that category. Atheism is mainly based on a hate of religion. There are strong correlations through scientific studies that show those that are atheist have a high % chance of having had troubles with their own fathers. This alone keeps them from getting in touch with the father of the universe. The common theme with atheist is their hate of religions, but as I have said all alone that with an open mind one can still believe in a higher power and not be religious at all.


    :)
     
    #872     Apr 29, 2008
  3. volente_00

    volente_00






    C.

    How bout I give my kid an atheist repsonse and start arguing with him on what the defintion of exist even means.





    :)
     
    #873     Apr 29, 2008
  4. volente_00

    volente_00





    Ironic that the bible told of this long before science had a clue


    Genesis 3:19:


    In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread till thou return to the earth, out of which thou wast taken: for dust thou art, and into dust thou shalt return.
     
    #874     Apr 29, 2008
  5. The Bible also says in the Genesis 1-3 creation accounts that all life appeared within six days. The Bible, in that instance, has no clue whatsoever; indeed, the Bible's writers were essentially clueless about science throughout.
     
    #875     Apr 29, 2008
  6.  
    #876     Apr 29, 2008
  7. volente_00

    volente_00


    A skeptic could also argue what exactly was the definition of a day back then.

    Is it scientifically possible that the earth was rotating a lot slower compared to today's speed?
     
    #877     Apr 29, 2008
  8. volente_00

    volente_00

     
    #878     Apr 29, 2008

  9. Wait a minute, if there is no life anywhere else (given, we dont have the technology to actually find it even if it was out there) wouldn't random fluke become even MORE plausible?
     
    #879     Apr 29, 2008
  10. Turok

    Turok

    Unless you can explain your answer better, I'm simply gonna take it as a total copout to the question.

    You have maintained quite continually during this thread that when it comes to the existance of entities, there is only ONE logical position ... agnostic.

    Your definition of agnostice has clearly been defined in this thread as one who says "I don't know" when asked if a entity exists.

    If you tell your kid that Santa (or GI Joe, or Batman, or the Tooth Fairy, or Unicorns, or , or, or ... doesn't exist, you are taking an illogical position according to your own words.

    I find it hard to believe that your position, so strongly state here, is one you actually take in your own life as it applies to other entities.

    JB
     
    #880     Apr 29, 2008